期刊文献+

基于网络商盟的信任交易管理机制研究 被引量:6

Research of Trust Transaction Management Mechanism Based on Online Marketing Coalition
下载PDF
导出
摘要 如何建立有效的信任交易管理机制是网络交易信任管理中的一个重要问题。在分析现有网络信任交易机制局限性的基础上,根据网络交易信任问题的特点和现实社会中商业联盟的特性,提出一种基于网络商盟的信任交易管理机制,建立事前防范,事中协调,事后惩罚三位一体的欺诈约束机制,保障网络交易的安全性。本研究有效解决三方面问题:1)解决新注册用户难以开展业务的问题;2)有效防止会员通过变换身份进行欺诈;3)降低网络交易平台仲裁的工作量。采用博弈理论分析该机制下的交易方行为,可以证明诚信交易是长期博弈的子博弈完美纳什均衡策略。 How to build an effective trust transaction mechanism is one of the most important problems in online trading management. Based on analyzing limitations of the existing online trust transaction mechanism, and according to characteristics of online transaction trust problem and business coalition in traditional commerce field, the article proposes a new trust transaction management mechanism on the basis of online marketing coalition. The mechanism makes the online transaction safe by way of prevention beforehand, coordination during the process and punishment afterwards. Three problems can be solved effectively: 1 ) putting an end to the phenomenon that no one wants to transact with newly registered users; 2) preventing members from changing identity to cheat ; 3) reducing the workload of online business platform arbitration. By the behavior analysis between buyers and sellers with the above mechanism, we prove that the strategy of honest trade is the Sub-game Perfect Nash E- quilibrium in repeated game.
出处 《运筹与管理》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期126-132,共7页 Operations Research and Management Science
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70672092)
关键词 管理科学 信任机制 博弈理论 网络商盟 网络交易 management science trust mechanism game theory online marketing coalition online transactions
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1Edieal J P , Abraham S , Yaniv V. Managing online auctions: current business and research issues[ J]. Management Science, 2003, 49 ( 11 ) : 1457-1484.
  • 2艾瑞市场咨询.第八次网络购物在线欺诈调查报告[EB/OL].http://news.iresearch.cn/charts/60259.shtml,2006.
  • 3Cripps M, Mailath G, Samuelson L. Imperfect monitoring and impermanent reputations[ J]. Econometrica, 2004, 72 (2) : 407- 432.
  • 4Resnick P, Zeckhauser R. Reputation systems: facilitating trust in Internet interactions[ J]. Communications of the ACM, 2000, 43( 12): 45-48.
  • 5彭赓,吕本富,胡新爱.网上拍卖与信誉机制的缺陷[J].预测,2004,23(1):33-36. 被引量:22
  • 6张娥,杨飞,汪应洛.网上交易中诚信交易激励机制设计[J].管理科学学报,2007,10(1):64-70. 被引量:28
  • 7Dellarocas C. Efficiency through feedback-contingent fees and rewards in auction marketplaces with adverse selection and moral hazard[ C]. Proceedings of the 4th ACM conference on Electronic commerce, California, 2003: 11-18.
  • 8Dellarocas C. Goodwill hunting: an economically efficient online feedback[ J]. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, 2002, 2531 : 238-252.
  • 9Ba S, Whinston A B, Zhang H. Building trust in online auction markets through an economic incentive mechanism[ J]. Decision Support Systems, 2003, 35 (3) : 273-286.
  • 10田厚平,郭亚军.基于可信威胁的群体协商谈判模型及其应用[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(5):9-17. 被引量:6

二级参考文献26

  • 1田厚平,郭亚军.基于可信威胁的群体协商谈判模型及其应用[J].管理科学学报,2004,7(5):9-17. 被引量:6
  • 2.中国互联网络发展状况统计报告[R].中国互联网络信息中心,2003..
  • 3易趣网络信息服务(上海)有限公司.易趣拍卖网[EB/OL].http://papes.eachnet.com/st/page/about/job.htm,2003—11-01.
  • 4Lucking-Reiley D. Auctions on the Internet : what's being auctioned, and how [ R ]. Vanderbuilt University Working Paper, 1999.
  • 5Akerlof G. The market for "lemons" : quality uncertainty and the market mechanism[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 1970,84(3) :488-500.
  • 6Resnick P, Zeckhauser R. Trust among strangers in internet transactions: empirical analysis of eBay' s reputation system [ R ]. Working Paper Prepared for NBER Workshop, 2002.
  • 7Kaeprzzyk J, et al. A soft measure of consensts in the setting of partial preferences[J]. European Journal of Operational Research,1988, 34: 316-325.
  • 8Herrera F, et al. A model of consensus in group decision making under linguistic assessments[J]. F.S.S., 1996, 78:73- 87.
  • 9Herrera F, et al. Direct approach processes in group decision making using linguistic OWA operators[J]. F.S.S., 1996, 79:175-190.
  • 10Lee Huey-Ming. Group decision making using fuzzy sets theory for evaluating the rate of aggregation risk in software development[J]. F S S, 1996, 80: 261-271.

共引文献49

同被引文献122

引证文献6

二级引证文献44

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部