期刊文献+

收入增长、环境政策、环境有益技术与排污强度的链式关系

On the Chain-shaped Relationship among Income Growth, Environmental Policy, Environmental Technique and Pollution Intensity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 收入增长、环境政策、环境有益技术与排污强度之间存在环环传导的因果关系,但实证研究中若以人均收入变量的系数来度量技术效应会高估真实技术效应,低估不利环境总效应,使结论出现偏差。环境政策对收入变化作出响应有1年滞后期,有4年适应期;环境有益技术对环境政策变化作出响应也有1年滞后期,但受影响时间较长;环境有益技术进步可迅速降低排污强度,但抑制作用持续年限较短。 There exists the chain-shaped logic relationship among income growth, environmental policy, environment-friendly technique and pollution intensity. The causal relationship of pushing one by one is reasonable. However, if the coefficient of income per capita in empirical research was used to measure technique effects, the real technique effects would be overestimated , and then harmful overall environmental effects would be underevaluated as well as with a final biased conclusion. The environmental policy response to income change with one-year lagged period, four-year adapting period; environment-friendly technique also response to policy change with one-year lagged period, but being affected for a long time; the improvement of environment-friendly technique may deerease pollution intensity rapidly, but its positive function only last a short time.
作者 马建平
出处 《经济与管理》 2009年第10期32-36,共5页 Economy and Management
关键词 收入增长 排污强度 技术效应 逻辑链条 income growth pollution intensity technique effects logic chain
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Grossman, G M. and Kruger, A. R, 1991, "Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement", NBER Working Paper Series, No. 3914.
  • 2Copeland, B.R.and Taylor, M.S., 2003, "Trade, Growth and the Environment", NBER Working Paper Series,No.9823.
  • 3曲如晓,马建平.中国工业制品出口贸易与环境目标的相容性评估--基于环境效应分解模型[J].经济理论与经济管理,2009,29(4):5-10. 被引量:8
  • 4Grether, J. M., Mathys, N. A. and Melo, J. D., 2007, "Trade, Technique and Composition Effects: What is Behind the Fall in World-Wide SO2 Emissions 1990-2000?", CEPR Discussion Paper 6522.
  • 5Dasgupta, S., Mody, A., Roly, S.and Wheeler, D., 1995, " Environmental Regulation and Development: A Cross-country Empirical Analysis", Working Paper No. 1448, Policy Research Department, World Bank.
  • 6Cole, M. A. and Elliott, R. J. R., 2002, "Determining the Trade-environment Composition Effect: the Role of Capital, Lobor and Environmental Regulations", Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 46 (2003), pp. 363-383.

二级参考文献8

  • 1D. Brack. Balancing Trade and the Environment [J]. International Affairs, 1995, 71 (3).
  • 2H. Hettige, R. Lucas, D. Wheeler. The Toxic Intensity of Industrial Production.. Global Patterns, Trends, and Trade Policy [J] . American Economic Review, 1992, 82 (2).
  • 3C. Ferraz, C. Young. Trade Liberalization and Industrial Pollution in Brazil [R]. United Nations Publications, 1999.
  • 4A. Kander, M. Lindmark. Foreign Trade and Declining Pollution in Sweden: A Decomposition Analysis of Long-term Structural and Technological Effects [J] . Energy Policy, 2006, 34 (13).
  • 5M. A. Cole, A. J. Rayner. The Uruguay Round and Air Pollution: Estimating the Composition, Scale and Technique Effects of Trade Liberalization [J]. Journal of International Trade & Economic Development, 2000, 9 (3).
  • 6G. M. Grossman, A.B. Kruger. Environmental Impacts of a North American Free Trade Agreement [Z]. NBER Working Paper Series, 1991, 3 914.
  • 7B. R. Copeland, M.S. Taylor. Trade, Growth and the Environment [Z]. NBER Working Paper Series, 2003, 9 823.
  • 8W·阿瑟·刘易斯.经济增长理论[M].上海:三联书店,1990.

共引文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部