期刊文献+

结构抗震可靠度二种简化解析表达式的一致性证明 被引量:27

Verification of consistency of two simplified analytical formulations for structural seismic reliability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 结构抗震可靠度分析的解析求解一直是结构可靠度领域和地震工程领域研究者们的追求目标。解析表达式不仅有利于简化结构抗震可靠度分析这个极端困难的工作,而且也有利于进行基于可靠度的结构概率抗震性能设计与评定。从全概率定理的两种不同表达式出发,介绍了国际上流行的两种结构抗震可靠度解析表达式,过去一直认为这是两种理论基础不同的表达式。本文通过对地震易损性函数关系的解析推导,揭示了若干重要关系,证明了两种表达式的一致性。 Analytical solutions for seismic reliability analysis of structures have been the pursued objectives of many researchers in the communities of structural reliability and earthquake engineering for a long time. Analytical formulations can not only simplify the tedious and difficult process of seismic reliability analysis of structures but also favor the probabilistic performance - based seismic design and assessment of structures. In this study, two state-ofthe-art analytical formulations for structural seismic reliability are introduced from the two different aspects of total probability theorem (TPT). It was considered that the two formulations were different in the theoretical foundation in the past. However, this study verifies the consistency of the two formulations via the analytical derivation of the seismic fragility function, in which some important relationships are found.
作者 吕大刚
出处 《地震工程与工程振动》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第5期59-65,共7页 Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Dynamics
基金 国家自然科学基金重大研究计划(90715021) 国家自然科学基金项目(50678057 50108005) 地震行业科研专项基金(2008419073) 北京市自然科学基金(8082013) 教育部留学回国人员科研启动基金
关键词 抗震可靠度 解析表达式 地震危险性 地震易损性 全概率定理 seismic reliability analytical formulation seismic hazard seismic fragility total probability theorem
  • 相关文献

参考文献30

  • 1Der Kiureghian A. Structural reliability methods for seismic safety assessment: a review [ J]. Engineering Structures, 1996,18 (6) : 412 -424.
  • 2Pinto P E. Reliability methods in earthquake engineering [ J ]. Progress in Structural Engineering and Materials, 2001, 3:76 -85.
  • 3Au S K, Beck J L. Subset simulation and its application to seismic risk based on dynamic analysis [ J ]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2003,129(8) : 901 -917.
  • 4Franchin P. Reliability of uncertain inelastic structures under earthquake excitation [ J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics, ASCE, 2004,130 (2) : 180 - 191.
  • 5Pinto P E, Giannini R, Franchin P. Seismic reliability analysis of structures [ M]. Pavia:lUSS Press,2004.
  • 6Comell C A. Risk-based structural design [ C ]//Proceedings of Symposium on Risk Analysis, Nowak A. , Ed. , Department of Civil Engineering, University of Michigan, 1994 : 37 - 48.
  • 7Cornell C A. Calculating building seismic performance reliability : a basis for multi-level design norms [ C ]//Proceedings of th 11 th World Conference on Earthquake Engineering, Acapulco, Mexico, 1996:2122.
  • 8Song J L, Ellingwood B R. Seismic reliability of special moment steel frames with welded connections: II [ J]. Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE, 1999, 125(4): 372-384.
  • 9Ellingwood B R. Performance -based design: structural reliability considerations [ C ]//Mohamed E. Ed. , Advanced Technology in Structural Engincering: ASCE Structures Congress 2000, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, USA ,2000:78.
  • 10Ellingwood B R. Earthquake risk assessment of building structures [ J ]. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 2001 ; 74 (3) : 251 -262.

同被引文献314

引证文献27

二级引证文献291

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部