期刊文献+

莱伊教育平等思想述评

A Perspective on Educational Equality: the Equality Study of Douglas Rae
下载PDF
导出
摘要 平等和教育平等是两个较为复杂的范畴。莱伊从平等的对象、范围和目标等三个方面对平等范畴做了界定,认为平等对象包括个人平等、组内平等和组别平等,平等范围有分配和所得两种,平等目标则包括结果平等和机会平等。他进一步从平等的价值、属性、选择原则出发,对平等的选择进行了阐述。莱伊对平等的研究从多方面启发我们重新审视教育平等,对教育中的平等理解以及教育平等的选择等具有重要的启发价值。 Equality and educational equality are two complex categories. Rae had defined the category of equality, based on three aspects: the subject of equality, the domain of equality and the aim of equality. The subject of equality includes individual equality, inner group equality and between group equality; the domain of equality includes distribution and income ; the aim of equality includes the equality of outcome and the equality of opportunity. Rae had also defined the choice of equality based on the value, property and the choice principle of equality. Rae' s studies on educational equality shed new light on our study on educational equality in many aspects, and have significant enlightenment to the conception of equality and the choice of educational equality in modem education.
作者 诸燕 赵晶
出处 《集美大学学报(教育科学版)》 2009年第4期60-63,共4页 Journal of Jimei University:Education Science Edition
关键词 道格拉斯·莱伊 教育平等 平等对象 选择平等 Douglas Rae educational equality the subject of equality the choice of equality
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1RICHARD S. Yale school of management. Ely professor of management & professor of political science: Douglas W. Rae [EB/OL]. (2006-03-04) [2009-04-28] http: //tuba. yale. edu/fsculty/profiles/rae, shtml.
  • 2RAE D W. No person is an island: the issue of equality among groups and individuals [ M]//Paper prepared for the Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association . Washington D C, 1980:1 -28.
  • 3RAE D W, YATES D, HOCHSCHILD J. et al. Equalities [M]. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1981.
  • 4李江源.教育平等新论[J].浙江社会科学,2001(2):116-121. 被引量:13
  • 5许庆豫.教育发展论:理论评介与个案分析[M].福州:福建教育出版社,2005.
  • 6许庆豫.试论教育平等与教育分流的关系[J].华东师范大学学报(教育科学版),2000,18(3):23-31. 被引量:28
  • 7RAE D W. Two contradictory ideas of (political) equality[J]. Ethics, 1981, 91 (3) : 451 -456.
  • 8朱永新.关于基础教育均衡发展的建议[J].民主,2003,0(5):24-25. 被引量:2

二级参考文献11

  • 1萨托利.《民主新论》[M].东方出版社,1993..
  • 2罗尔斯.《正义论》[M].中国社会科学出版社,1988年版.第135页.
  • 3阿瑟·奥肯.《平等与效率》[M].华夏出版社,1987年.第10页.
  • 4《亚里士多德全集》(第八卷),中国人民大学出版社1992年版,第279页.
  • 5[15,20]联合国教科文组织编:《学会生存--教育世界的今天和明天》,教育科学出版社1999年版,第100、101、102页.
  • 6Douglas·W·Rae,Equalities,Cambridge,Mass:Harvard University Press.1981.65-66
  • 7萨缪尔森:《经济学》(下卷),商务印书馆1982年版,第232页.
  • 8诺齐克:《国家、无政府和乌托邦》,中国社会科学出版社1990年版,第153页.
  • 9艾德勒等编:《西方思想宝库》,吉林人民出版社,1988年版,第1047页.
  • 10[29]哈耶克:《自由秩序原理》,三联书店1997年版,第458、112页.

共引文献38

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部