摘要
本文试图从记述对象身份、事件选取和表现方式三个方面将桐城派文章与《史记》中的人物传记进行比较,揭示了桐城文章虽对《史记》有所继承,但却体现了一系列新的变化。从而在某种程度上阐明桐城派能够不断发展壮大,在整个有清一代成为文坛盟主的原因。
This essay attempts to compare the biographies written by Tongcheng School with those in Records of the Historian in the following three aspects:the identity of the description object,the events selected and the representation.It reveals that Tongcheng School inherits the Records of the Historian and it also has a series of new changes.To some extent,it can clarify why Tongcheng School can develop and grow in strength and becomes the leader of literary in the Qing Dynasty at last.
出处
《西昌学院学报(社会科学版)》
2009年第3期59-60,69,共3页
Journal of Xichang University:Social Science Edition
关键词
桐城派
《史记》
人物传记
Tongcheng School
Records of the Historian
Biographies