期刊文献+

水环境健康风险模糊评价模式研究 被引量:11

Study on Fuzzy Model for Water Environmental Health Risk Assessment
下载PDF
导出
摘要 从风险评价系统的模糊性、不精确性出发,运用三角模糊数基本原理描述和表征水环境健康风险.在将常规的确定性模型参数定义为三角模糊参数的基础上,建立了水环境健康风险模糊评价模式.根据该模式,可以计算得到以三角模糊数表示的水环境健康风险程度.作为案例,将该模式应用于淮河干流安徽段某水域的环境健康风险评价,得到总的基因毒物质、躯体毒物质健康风险水平分别为(2.701×10-5,7.760×10-5,20.185×10-5)a-1,(0.463×10-8,1.425×10-8,4.147×10-8)a-1.实例研究表明:相对于传统确定性模型,所建模糊评价模式能够更好地刻画研究区域水环境健康风险状态. Based on the vagueness and imprecision of assessment system of water environmental health risk, the triangular fuzzy number theory was utilized to denote the health risk. On the basis of defining the parameters in traditional certain models as triangular fuzzy numbers, uncertain models with triangular fuzzy parameters were established. According to these fuzzy models, the membership functions of risk can be obtained directly. As a case, these new models were used to assess the environmental health risk of a certain water area of Anhui province in Huaihe River. Its total risks, corresponding to gene and non-gene toxic substances, were equal to (2. 701 × 10^-5, 7. 760 × 10^-5, 20. 185× 10^-5) a^-1 and (0. 463× 10^-8,1. 425× 10^-8,4. 147× 10^-8) a^-1, respectively. Study result shows that the fuzzy models more scientifically reveal the health risk state of a studied water environment than the traditional ones.
作者 李如忠
出处 《中北大学学报(自然科学版)》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第5期443-449,共7页 Journal of North University of China(Natural Science Edition)
基金 安微省自然科学基金资助项目(050450303)
关键词 环境健康风险评价 三角模糊数 α-截集技术 隶属函数 environmental health risk assessment; triangular fuzzy number α-cut technique; membership function
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1U. S EPA. Risk assessment guidance for superfund.. Volumel-Human health evaluation manual (Part B), development of risk-based preliminary remediation goals. EPA/540/R92/003[R]. Washington, DC: Office of Emergency and Remedial Response U.S. EPA, 2001.
  • 2Teunis P F M, Medema G J, Kruidenier L, et al. Assessment of the infection by Cryptosporidium or Giardia in drinking water from a surface water source[J]. Water Research, 1997, 31(6): 1333-1346.
  • 3Muddassir N, Faisal I K. Human health risk modeling for various exposure routes of trihalomethanes (THMs) in potable water supply[J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2006, 21(10) : 1416-1429.
  • 4Chowdhury S, Husain T, Bose N. Fuzzy rule-based modeling for human health risk from naturally occurring radioactive materials in produced water[J]. Journal of Environmental Radioactivity, 2006, 89(1): 1-17.
  • 5Kentel E, Aral M M. 2D monte carlo versus 2D fuzzy monte carlo health risk assessment [J]. Stochastic Environmental Research and Risk Assessment, 2005, 19(1): 86-96.
  • 6吴义锋,薛联青,吕锡武.基于未确知数学理论的水质风险评价模式[J].环境科学学报,2006,26(6):1047-1052. 被引量:35
  • 7苏伟,刘景双,王洋.第二松花江干流水环境健康风险评价[J].自然资源学报,2007,22(1):79-85. 被引量:36
  • 8孙树青,胡国华,王勇泽,李诚.湘江干流水环境健康风险评价[J].安全与环境学报,2006,6(2):12-15. 被引量:84
  • 9Xu Peng, Huang Shengbiao, Wang Zijian, et al. Daily intakes of copper, zinc and arsenic in drinking water by population of Shanghai, China[J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2006, 362(1-3): 50-55.
  • 10钱家忠,李如忠,汪家权,李昱霞.城市供水水源地水质健康风险评价[J].水利学报,2004,35(8):90-93. 被引量:146

二级参考文献52

共引文献423

同被引文献119

引证文献11

二级引证文献103

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部