期刊文献+

基于GIS的Logistic回归模型在地质灾害危险性区划中的应用 被引量:23

The application of GIS-based logistic regression for geological hazards zonation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 地质灾害危险性区划是将区域内产生崩塌、滑坡等地质灾害的条件、诱发地质灾害发生的外界因子,以及地质灾害现状综合统计分析,定量或半定量地评价区域内地质灾害的危险性程度等级。以贵州省为研究区域,首先将单个灾害因子分级,并在GIS环境下结合已发生的地质灾害进行二元空间统计分析,得到单因子各级别下灾害面积和灾害指标。然后,利用Logistic回归模型、GIS空间分析工具和统计软件寻求最合适的模型描述灾害是否发生(因变量)和5个灾害因子(高程、地层岩性、河流切割程度、坡度、年平均降雨量等)之间的关系。最后,应用Logistic回归模型计算危险性概率,绘制贵州省地质灾害危险性区划图。该区划图将贵州省分为低、中等、高、很高等4个危险性区域,分别占贵州省面积的16.37%、26.34%、43.30%和13.99%。 Geological hazards zonation is making a comprehensive statistical analysis of conditions or external factors that induced hazards of collapse and landslide, and historic geological hazards in an area, then it defines levels of danger of the geological hazards by using quantitative or semi-quantitative methods. Firstly, the study divided every factor which induces hazards to several subclasses, made bivariate statistical analyses combined with historical geological hazards in Guizhou Province, and gotten the hazards area and index of every subclass under GIS environment. Secondly, the use of logistic regression, GIS spatial tools and statistical software is to find the best fitting function to describe the relationship between the presence or absence of hazards (dependent variable) and 5 independent factors (elevation, lithology, annual rainfall, etc. ). Lastly, the study calculated the hazards probability by using logistic regression model, created the geological hazards zonation. Using the predicted map of probability, the study area was classified into four categories of landslide susceptibility: low, medium and high and very high which take up 16.37%, 26.34%, 43.30% and 13.99% of the total study area, respectively.
作者 王卫东 钟晟
出处 《工程勘察》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期5-10,共6页 Geotechnical Investigation & Surveying
基金 交通部西部项目(200331880201)
关键词 地质灾害 危险性区划 LOGISTIC回归 GIS技术 geological hazards susceptibility mapping logistic regression GIS
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1刘汉超,陈明东等.库区环境地质研究[M].成都:成都科技大学出版社,1993.
  • 2张业成,张梁.论地质灾害风险评价[J].地质灾害与环境保护,1996,7(3):1-6. 被引量:43
  • 3张业成,张梁,高庆华.地质灾害减灾指导思想与对策建议[J].国土资源科技管理,2000,17(3):34-36. 被引量:4
  • 4Barredol, J. I., Benavidesz, A., Herhl, J., Van Westen, C. J.. Comparing heuristic landslide hazard assessment techniques using GIS in the Tirajana basin, Gran Canaria Island, Spain [ J ]. International Journal of Applied Earth Observation and Geoinformation, 2000, (2) : 9 - 23.
  • 5Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H., Ugawa, N.. Landslide susceptibility mapping using GIS-based weighted lineac combination, the case in Tsugawa area of Agano River, Niigata Prefecture, Japan [ J ]. Landslides, 2004, (1) : 73 -81.
  • 6Soeters, R., Van Westen, C. J.. Slope instability recognition, analysis, and zonation [ J ]. Transport Research Board Special Report, 1996, 247: 129-177.
  • 7Aleotti, P., Chowdhury, R.. Landslide hazard assessment : summary review and new perspectives [ J]. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment 1999, 58:21 - 44.
  • 8Ayalew, L., Yamagishi, H.. The application of GIS-based logistic regression for landslide susceptibility mapping in the Kakuda-Yakiko Mountains, Central Japan [ J ]. Geomorphology, 2005, 65 : 15 - 31.
  • 9Carrara, A., Crosta, G., Frattini, P.. Geomorphological and historical data in assessing landslide hazard [ J ]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2003, 28:1125 - 1142.
  • 10Baeza, C. Comminas, J.. Assessment of shallow landslide susceptibility by means of multivariate statistical techniques [ J ]. Earth Surface Processes and Landforms, 2001, 26:1251 - 1263.

二级参考文献19

共引文献163

同被引文献265

引证文献23

二级引证文献202

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部