期刊文献+

Exploring Social Annotations with the Application to Web Page Recommendation 被引量:2

Exploring Social Annotations with the Application to Web Page Recommendation
原文传递
导出
摘要 Collaborative social annotation systems allow users to record and share their original keywords or tag attachments to Web resources such as Web pages, photos, or videos. These annotations are a method for organizing and labeling information. They have the potential to help users navigate the Web and locate the needed resources. However, since annotations axe posted by users under no central control, there exist problems such as spare and synonymous annotations. To efficiently use annotation information to facilitate knowledge discovery from the Web, it is advantageous if we organize social annotations from semantic perspective and embed them into algorithms for knowledge discovery. This inspires the Web page recommendation with annotations, in which users and Web pages are clustered so that semantically similar items can be related. In this paper we propose four graphic models which cluster users, Web pages and annotations and recommend Web pages for given users by assigning items to the right cluster first. The algorithms are then compared to the classical collaborative filtering recommendation method on a real-world data set. Our result indicates that the graphic models provide better recommendation performance and are robust to fit for the real applications. Collaborative social annotation systems allow users to record and share their original keywords or tag attachments to Web resources such as Web pages, photos, or videos. These annotations are a method for organizing and labeling information. They have the potential to help users navigate the Web and locate the needed resources. However, since annotations axe posted by users under no central control, there exist problems such as spare and synonymous annotations. To efficiently use annotation information to facilitate knowledge discovery from the Web, it is advantageous if we organize social annotations from semantic perspective and embed them into algorithms for knowledge discovery. This inspires the Web page recommendation with annotations, in which users and Web pages are clustered so that semantically similar items can be related. In this paper we propose four graphic models which cluster users, Web pages and annotations and recommend Web pages for given users by assigning items to the right cluster first. The algorithms are then compared to the classical collaborative filtering recommendation method on a real-world data set. Our result indicates that the graphic models provide better recommendation performance and are robust to fit for the real applications.
出处 《Journal of Computer Science & Technology》 SCIE EI CSCD 2009年第6期1028-1034,共7页 计算机科学技术学报(英文版)
基金 supported in part by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under Grant Nos. 60621001, 60875028,60875049, and 70890084 the Chinese Ministry of Science and Technology under Grant No. 2006AA010106, the Chinese Academy of Sciences under Grant Nos. 2F05N01, 2F08N03 and 2F07C01
关键词 graphic model EM (expectation-maximization) social annotation TAG RECOMMENDATION graphic model, EM (expectation-maximization), social annotation, tag, recommendation
  • 相关文献

参考文献22

  • 1George W. Farnas, Caterina Fake, Luis von Ahn, Joshua Schachter, Scott Gdder, Kevin Fox, Marc Davis, Cameron Marlow, Mor Naaman. Why do tagging systems work? In Proceedings of Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Montreal, Canada, April 22-27, 2006, pp.36 39.
  • 2Margaret E I Kipp, D Grant Campbell. Patterns and inconsistencies in collaborative tagging systems: An examination of tagging practices. In Proceedings of American Society for Information Science and Technology, Austin, USA, Nov, 5-9, 2007.
  • 3George Macgregor, Emma McCulloch. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organization and resource discovery tool. Library Review, 2006, 55(5): 291-300.
  • 4John C Paolillo, Shashikant Penumarthy. The social structure of tagging Internet video on Del.icio.us. In Proc. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Hawaii, USA, Jan. 3-6, 2007, pp.85b.
  • 5Hotho A,Jaschke R, Schmitz C, Stumme G. Trend detection in folksonomies. In Proc. the First International Conference on Semantics And Digital Media Technology, Athens, Greece, Dec. 6-8, 2006, pp.56-77.
  • 6Mika P. Ontologies are us: A unified model of social networks and semantics. In Proc. International Semantic Web Conference, Galway, Ireland, Nov. 6 10, 2005, pp.5-15:.
  • 7Noruzi A. Editorial. Folksonomies: Why do we need controlled vocabulary? Webology, 2007, 4(2).
  • 8Macgregor G, McCulloch E. Collaborative tagging as a knowledge organisation and resource discovery tool. Library Review, 2006, 55(5): 291-300.
  • 9Paul Heymann, Georgia Koutrika, Hector Garcia-Molina. Can social bookmarking improve Web search? In Proc. the International Conference on Web Search and Web Data Mining, Palo Alto, USA, Feb. 11-12, 2008, pp.195-206.
  • 10Ames M, Naaman M. Why we tag: Motivations for annotation in mobile and online media. In Proc. the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, San Jose, USA, April 28-May 3, 2007, pp.971-980.

同被引文献33

引证文献2

二级引证文献29

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部