期刊文献+

视觉表象产生的大脑半球专门化效应 被引量:2

Hemispheric Specialization Effects in Visual Image Generation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 采用Kosslyn单侧视野速示技术,以英文字母图片为学习材料,通过三个实验考察了视觉表象产生的大脑半球专门化效应。实验一提出在两种类型的视觉表象产生任务中,有两种截然不同的加工起作用,但却不能直接证实这两种不同加工机制的存在。实验二和实验三则进一步证实了两种表象产生任务具有不同的认知加工机制,并表现出不同的大脑半球专门化效应。上述研究表明:大脑两半球均参与产生视觉心理表象,但分工不同,并表现出不同的单侧化效应:大脑左半球通过运用类别空间关系产生表象更有效,大脑右半球运用数量空间关系产生表象更有效。结果进一步拓展了Kosslyn关于视觉空间关系加工的大脑半球专门化观点。 Visual mental image generation had been defined as the process by which long-term memory knowledge of the visual appearance of objects or scenes is used to create a short-term percept-like image. It was a complex and multi-componential cognitive process,and a most basic process in visual mental image process. That researched systematically on it would not only favor us deeply understanding the law of human visual mental image process,but examining and evaluating visual spatial cognition functional level most effectively in practice. The localization of mental image generation had been a controversial topic,whether hemispheric specialization really existed in visual mental image generation process? What roles that both hemispheres played in image generation process? All these questions needed to be explored again. Using two tasks dissociated paradigm developed by Kosslyn,three behavior experiments were conducted to reveal the Hemispheric Specialization during visual image generation process. Seventy two right-handed undergraduates (aged between 19 and 21) took part in the experiments. In three experiments,a classical image generation task was adopted to investigate the cognitive processing mechanism of simple letters image generation. Subjects were cued to form images within a grid or within a set of four corner brackets; a single X mark was enclosed within each stimulus,and the subjects were to determine whether the X mark would have fallen on an imaged pattern. Reaction time (measured from the end of the question to the onset of the participants' response) and error rates were recorded and analyzed. The aim of these experiments was to clarify the different roles of two hemispheres in generating the mental images. Some evidence was obtained by having subjects memorize letters in grids(which are easily encoded using descriptions of the positions of segments) or within a space delineated by four brackets(which require memorizing the precise positions of the segments). In Experiment 1,we found evidence that the right hemisphere was better at generating images in brackets,whereas there was no such hemispheric difference for the grids. In Experiment 2,we found no evidence that size per se affected image generation differently in the two hemispheres,indeed,this experiment only replicated earlier results,with a right hemisphere advantage for brackets stimuli. In experiment 3,the subjects required less time when the stimuli were presented initially to the left hemisphere,which was as expected if categorical spatial relations were used to arrange segments into an image. Through these experiments,Subjects were relatively more accurate when cued in the left visual field with bracket stimuli,but tended to be relatively more accurate when cued in the right visual field with grids stimuli. These results were predicted by the theory that images are built up by arranging parts,and that two different processes can be used to arrange them. One process used stored descriptions to arrange parts,and was more effective in the left cerebral hemisphere; The other process used stored memories of metric positions to arrange parts,and was more effective in the right cerebral hemisphere. The present results suggested that visual mental images could be generated by either the left or right cerebral hemisphere,but in different ways. The left hemisphere more effectively generated images by arranging parts according to descriptions (using categorical spatial relations),whereas the right hemisphere more effectively generated images by positioning parts in precise locations in space(using coordinate spatial relations).
出处 《心理学报》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期911-921,共11页 Acta Psychologica Sinica
基金 国家社会科学基金“十一五”规划2007年度教育学国家一般项目(BBA070016) 国家自然科学基金(30570602) 教育部“新世纪优秀人才支持计划”(NCET-05-0862)资助项目
关键词 表象产生 大脑半球专门化效应 空间关系 类别和数量 image generation hemispheric specialization spatial relations categorical /coordinate
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1Bowers, D., & Heilman K. M. (1991). Differential impact of right and left hemisphere lesions on facial emotion and object imagery. Brain, 114, 2593-2609.
  • 2Clarissa, J. R., & Stiles, J. (2005). Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations during an image generation task: evidence from children and adults. Neuropsychologia, 43, 517-529.
  • 3Denis, M. (2003). Mental Scanning of Visual Images Generated from Verbal Descriptions: Towards a Model of Image Accruacy. Neuropsychologia, 33(11), 1511-1530.
  • 4Erlichman, H., & Marrett, J. (1983). Right hemisphere specialization for mental imagery: A review of evidence. Brain Cognition, 2, 55-76.
  • 5Farah, M. J. (1986). The laterality of mental image generation: A test with normal subjects. Neuropsychologia, 24, 541-551.
  • 6Farah, M. J. (1995). Current issues in the neuropsychology of image generation. Neuropsychologia, 33 (11), 1455-1471.
  • 7Kosslyn, S. M. (Ed). (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate ( pp. 285-325). Cambridge, Massachusetts: The MITT Press.
  • 8Kosslyn, S. M. (1995). Two Type of image generation: Evidence for left and right hemisphere process. Neuropsychologia, 33(11), 1485-1510.
  • 9Kosslyn, S. M. (2003). Mental imagery: against the nihilistic hypothesis. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), 109-111.
  • 10Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Two type of image generation: Evidence from PET. Cognitive, Affective & Behavioral Neuroscience, 5(1), 41-53.

同被引文献20

  • 1刘耀荣,时倩,时伟.论表象训练原理及其在运动训练中的作用[J].西安体育学院学报,2004,21(S1):178-179. 被引量:13
  • 2刘练红,皇甫恩,苗丹民,刘旭峰.心理旋转的事件相关电位P_(300)研究进展[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2004,15(4):248-250. 被引量:8
  • 3陈耕春.高水平运动技能训练中的运动知觉心理训练取向[J].西安体育学院学报,2007,24(3):9-12. 被引量:21
  • 4Kosslyn, S. M. (1994). Image and Brain: The Resolution of the Imagery Debate. Cambridge, Massachusetts, The MITT Press: 285-325.
  • 5Lamber, S. , et al. (2004). Blindbess and brain plasticity: contribution of mental imagery? An fMRI study. Cognitive Brain Research, 20: 1-11.
  • 6Kosslyn, S. M. (1995). Two Type of Image Generation: Evidence for Left and Right Hemisphere Process. Neuropsy'hologia , 33 ( 11 ) : 1485-1510.
  • 7Clarissa, J. , ,Stiles, R. J. (2005). Hemispheric specialization for categorical and coordinate spatial relations during an image generation task : evidence from children and adults. Neuropsychologia, 43 : 517- 529.
  • 8Kosslyn ,S. M. , Margolis, J. A. (1990). Age Differences in Imagery Abilities. Child Development, 61:995-1010.
  • 9Hellige, J.B. & Michimata, C. ( 1992 ). Categorization versus distance: Hemispheric differences for processing spatial information. Memory and Cognition, 17:770-776.
  • 10Kosslyn, S. M. (2005). Two Type of Image Generation:Evidence from PET. Cognitive, Affective , & Behavioral Neuroscience , ( 1 ) : 41-53.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部