期刊文献+

基于测量不确定度的电力系统状态估计 (三)算法比较 被引量:30

Power System Static-state Estimation Based on Uncertainty of Measurement Part Three Algorithms Compared
下载PDF
导出
摘要 加权最小二乘估计准则在电力系统状态估计中应用广泛,但其结果易受不良测点影响。为解决这一问题,已经提出了加权最小绝对值准则、非二次准则等估计器。应用大量算例,对已有估计准则和文中所提出的以最大测点正常率为目标的状态估计方法进行了对比研究,进一步对残差污染情况进行了讨论。算例表明,在估计结果合理性方面,当测点中不含不良数据时,文中所提出的方法与加权最小二乘估计相当,优于其他方法;当测点中含有不良数据时,文中所提出的方法大幅度优于以往状态估计方法,说明所提出的方法可较好地解决残差污染问题。 The weighted least squares (WLS) estimator is the currently most widely used method for power system state estimation. However, the estimation results of WLS could be far from the true values of state variables when bad data, are present. To solve the problem, a non-quadratic objective estimator, the weighted least absolute value (WLAV) estimator, and least mean squares (LMS) estimator are proposed. Numerical simulations, including residual pollution examples, are carried out to compare existing estimators and the maximum normal rate estimator (MNR) described in the second paper of this series. Test results show that the proposed method is as good as WLS and better than other methods when no bad data is contained in the test system, and it is far superior to all other methods when test points contain bad data, showing that the proposed method can deal with the residual pollution scenario fairly well.
出处 《电力系统自动化》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第21期28-31,71,共5页 Automation of Electric Power Systems
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(50507013)~~
关键词 状态估计 加权最小二乘 加权最小绝对值 非二次准则 测点正常率 state estimation weighted least squares weighted least absolute value non-quadratic objective normal rate of measuring points
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献11

  • 1张伯明,王世缨,相年德.递归量测误差估计辨识法及其应用[J].电力系统及其自动化学报,1992,4(1):1-8. 被引量:10
  • 2SCHWEPPE F C, WILDES J, ROM D B. Power system staticstate estimation: Part Ⅰ, Ⅱ, Ⅲ. IEEE Trans on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1970, 89(1): 120-125; 125-130; 130- 135.
  • 3BALDICK R, CLEMENTS K A, PINJO-IAZIGAL Z, et al. Implementing non-quadratic objective functions for state estimation and bad data rejection. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1): 376-382.
  • 4CELIK M K, ABUR A. A robust WLAV state estimator using transformations. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1992, 7(1): 106-113.
  • 5SINGH H, ALVARADO F L, LIU W H E. Constrained LAV state estimation using penalty functions. IEEE Trans on Power Systems, 1997, 12(1):383-388.
  • 6MILI L, CHENIAL M G, ROUSSEEUW P J. Robust state estimation of electric power systems. IEEE Trans on Circuits and Systems: Fundamental Theory and Applications, 1994, 41(5) : 349-358.
  • 7HANDSCHIN E, SCHWEPPE F C, KOHLAS J, et al. Bad data analysis for power system state estimation. IEEE Trans on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1975, 94(2): 329-337.
  • 8MILI L, CUTSEM T V, RIBBENS-PAVELLA M. Hypothesis testing identification: a new method Eor data analysis in power system state estimation. IEEE Trans on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1984, 103(11):3239-3252.
  • 9BIPM, IEC, IFCC, et al. Guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement. Geneva, Switzerland : International Organization for Standardization, 1993.
  • 10KOTIGUA W W, VIDYASGAR M. Bad data rejection properties of weighted least absolute value techniques applied to static state estimation. IEEE Trans on Power Apparatus and Systems, 1982, 101(4): 844-853.

共引文献59

同被引文献404

引证文献30

二级引证文献269

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部