期刊文献+

淋病性多发性尿道狭窄6例

原文传递
导出
摘要 目的提高对淋病的认识,以及在医疗条件欠缺下,其严重并发症的治疗效果。方法分析2005年9月~2007年3月援外医疗队所在医院(乌干达金贾医院)收治的6例淋病性多发性尿道狭窄;其中5例在膀胱镜下经尿道外口或膀胱颈口插入F4输尿管导管至膀胱内或尿道外口,用输尿管导管带入F14号的两腔气囊尿管进行尿道扩张并留置尿管,同时保留造瘘管,每周更换一次尿管直至1720号并保留3周,同时拔出膀胱造瘘管;3周后拔出尿管,每周用尿道扩张器行尿道扩张1次,共2~3月;1例在膀胱镜下不能插入输尿管导管改行最狭窄处的尿道成形并用扩张器扩张其它的狭窄段后放入F18号双腔气囊尿管保留3周。所有病人均给予口服抗菌素治疗2个月。结果随访3个月-1年,其中4例能自行排尿,尿流无明显变细;2例在5~7个月时,尿流有所变细,再次给予尿道扩张每周1次,共4次后,尿流变粗。结论淋病所致的多发性尿道狭窄是淋病的严重并发症,因此,对于淋病应早期发现、早期进行规范有效的治疗,同时对性伴侣进行检查治疗。在膀胱镜指引下用尿管进行软性尿道扩张后再用金属扩张器进行尿道扩张不适为治疗多发性尿道狭窄的一种方法。
出处 《医学新知》 CAS 2009年第5期313-314,共2页 New Medicine
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1McMillan A. Urethral stricture and urethritis in men [ J ]. Scotland Genitourin Med, 1994 ,70 (6) :403-405.
  • 2Panchev P. The treatment of severe and complicated urethral strictures. Khirurgiia ( Sofiia ) [ J ], 1997,50 ( 1 ) : 53- 56.
  • 3Sharfi AR. Complicated male urethral strictures: presentation and management. Int Urol Nephrol [ J ]. 1989,21 ( 5 ) : 491-497.
  • 4Bewes P C. Urethral stricture. Trop Doer[J]. 1973 , (2) : 77-81.
  • 5Osoba AO. Gonococcal urethral stricture and watering-can perineum. Br J Vener Dis[J]. 1976 ,52(6) :387-393.
  • 6Singh M. The pathology of urethral stricture. J Urol [ J ], 1976 ,115(6) :673-676.
  • 7王剑松,杨德林,左毅刚,柯昌兴,丁明霞,颜汝平,刘靖宇,王伟,石永福,徐鸿毅.经尿道等离子剜除电切治疗前列腺增生症(附1500例报告)[J].医学新知,2009,19(1):16-18. 被引量:1

二级参考文献9

  • 1Varkarakis J, Bartsch G, Horninger W, et al. Long-term morbidity and mortality of transurethral prostatectomy : a 10- year follow-up[J]. Prostate, 2004, 58: 248-251.
  • 2Mebust W K, Hohgrewe H L, Cockett A T, et al. Transurethral prostatectomy: immediate and postoperative complications. Cooperative study of 13 participating institutions evaluating 3,885 patients [ J ]. J Urol, 2002,167 : 5-9.
  • 3Poulakis V, Dahm P, Witzsch U, et al. Transurethral electrovaporization vs transurethral resection for symptomatic prostatic obstruction : a meta- analysis [ J ]. BJU Int, 2004, 94 : 89-95.
  • 4Rassweiler J, Teber D, Kuntz R, et al. Complications of transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP) -incidence, management, and prevention[ J]. Eur Urol, 2006,50:969- 979.
  • 5Cetinkaya M, Ulusoy E, Adsan O, et al. Comparative early results of transurethral electroresection and transurethral electrovaporization in benign prostatic hyperplasia[ J]. Br J Urol, 1996,78 : 901 -903.
  • 6Gupta N, Sivaramakrishna, Kumar R, et al. Comparison of standard transurethral resection, transurethral vapour resection and holmium laser enucleation of the prostate for managing benign prostatic hyperplasia of >40 g[ J]. BJU Int,2006,97 : 85-89.
  • 7Erturhan S, Erbagci A, Seckiner I, et al. Plasmakinetic resection of the prostate versus standard transurethral resection of the prostate: a prospective randomized trial with 1- year follow-up [ J ]. Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis, 2007,10 : 97-100.
  • 8Hon N H, Brathwaite D, Hussain Z, et al. A prospective, randomized trial comparing conventional transurethral prostate resection with PlasmaKinetic vaporization of the prostate: physiological changes, early complications and long- term followup[ J ]. J Urol,2006,176:205-209.
  • 9Neill M G, Gilling P J, Kennett K M, et al. Randomized trial comparing holmium laser enucleation of prostate with plasmakinetic enucleation of prostate for treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia[ J]. Urology,2006,68 : 1020-1024.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部