期刊文献+

环境权与人权问题的国际视野 被引量:17

Environmental Right and Human Right:An International Perspective
下载PDF
导出
摘要 环境权可以视为第一代人权中的生命权、私人生活权、财产权,由此可以促使政府保护生命和财产免受环境侵害,但这会产生人类中心主义问题;作为第二代人权,能够赋予环境质量以同其他经济、社会与文化权利相当的法律地位,使其优先于其他无权利依据的客体,但是很少对这类人权进行司法;作为集体权利有环境保护的意义,例如保护少数族裔文化和土著居民。国际法上环境权作为实体权利还未建立起来,作为程序性权利体现为公众对环境事务的知情权,决策参与权,司法救济权。通过人权保护环境,其优点在于人权与环境权相比是一项确定的权利,人权法院裁判了一些有环保意义的案子,缺点在于与人无关的环境本身的损害得不到保护,无法进行公益诉讼。 Environmental right can be put into first generation human fights of fight of life, of private life and property right, which can make government to protect life and property from environmental harm, but can lead to anthopocentralism problems. While taking environmental right as the second generation human rights, it can put environmental quality in the same position as thre other economic, social and cultural rights, and having priority over the other matters which are not taken as rights, but rights in this category is not subject to judicial reviewe. As collective fights of the third generation, it has the significance of protecting environment such as protecting cultures of minorities and indigenous people. Environmental right as substantive right has not been established while as procedural fight including access to information, participation in decision - making and access to justice, it has been well - established. The advantage of protecting environment by way of protecting human rights is that human fights are recognized rights while environmental rights are not, courts and tribunals have given judgements to some cases of environmental significance. The disadvantage is that damages of environment per se not relating to people cannot be remedied, and public interest related lawsuits can not be decided through human fight laws.
作者 那力 杨楠
机构地区 吉林大学法学院
出处 《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期59-65,共7页 Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词 环境权 人权 人权司法 程序性权利 environmental rights, human rights, judicial review of human rights, procedural rigjht
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1P. Bimie & A. Boyle, International Law and the Environment, 3ed edition, Oxford University Press, 2009.
  • 2P. Bimie & A. Boyle, International Law and the Environment, 3ed edition, Oxford University Press, 2009. 第276页.
  • 3UNCESCR, General Comment No 14: The Right to the Highest Attainable Standard of Health (2000).
  • 4Annan, Foreword. UNECE, The Aarhus Convention: An Implementation Guide.
  • 5neryildiz v Turkey(2004) ECHR 657,第90段.
  • 6Guerra v Italy (1998) 26 EHRR 357,第60段.
  • 7Taskin v Turkey [2006] 42 EHRR 50,第118段.
  • 8Port Hope Environmental Group v Canada, Comm No 67/1980,2 Selected Decisions UNHRC (1990) 20.
  • 9Bordes v France, UNHRC No 645/1995, Rept Human Rights Committee (1996) GAOR A/51/40 vol Ⅱ.
  • 10Yanomani Indians v Brazil, Decisions 7615, Inter -Am CHR, Inter - American YB on Hum Rts 264 ( 1985 ).

同被引文献355

引证文献17

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部