摘要
传统民法理论与民事立法的所有权中存在着占有权能制度,在所有权和他物权之外,还存在着独立的占有制度。我国《物权法》也专编专章用5个条文规定了独立的占有制度。但这种制度彼此间存在着诸多矛盾,对人们就物的支配关系并未形成完整统一的规范机制。在现代中国物权法理论中,可以舍弃独立于所有权和他物权之外的占有制度,而在所有权占有权能和所有权分离的基础上建立起属于他物权性质的控占权制度,以使其和属于自物权性质的所有权占有权能共同构建起具有中国特色的民商主体对物的支配关系的二元制法律体系。
There exists the occupying capacity constitution in the ownership of traditional civil theory and legislation, and independent occupancy system besides ownership and jura in re aliana. The completed and united norm mechanism about the subject's domination relation on res has not formatted because lots of contradictions exist in the system. Nowdays, in the theory of Chinese jus in rem ,we should abandon occupancy system which is independent of ownership and jura in re aliana and establish the control fight system having the character of jura in re aliana on the base of the separation of the occupying capacity and the ownership, then constructing the dual legal mechanism about civil -commerical subject's domination relation which includes the controlling right system and the occupying capacity having the character of jus in re propria.
出处
《法律科学(西北政法大学学报)》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第6期112-122,共11页
Science of Law:Journal of Northwest University of Political Science and Law
关键词
占有
占有权能
控占权
二元化
法律机制
occupy
occupying capacity
controlling fight
dualization
legal mechanism