期刊文献+

切口闭合引流对膝关节置换术近期安全性影响的系统评价 被引量:8

Systematic review of the earlier safety of closed suction drainage for knee arthroplasty
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的比较全膝关节置换术中切口放置闭合引流与不引流对手术后近期安全性的影响。方法收集所有关于比较全膝关节置换术中切口放置闭合引流与不引流对手术疗效影响的随机和半随机对照试验,对其逐个进行质量评价,作系统评价。结果共纳入12篇随机对照研究,包括1122例患者,1191例观察对象,纳入研究的方法学质量差异较大。切口引流与不引流的全膝关节置换术后切口感染率及下肢深静脉血栓发生率无统计学差异(P=0.62和P=0.94)。在术后切口血肿发生率及术后切口持续渗液等方面,术后放置引流与不放置引流之间差异无统计学意义(P=0.19和P=0.07)。在术后输血患者数方面,膝关节置换术后引流组有更多的患者需要输血(P=0.0006)。关于术后膝关节功能,两组间差异无统计学意义。结论根据本系统评价的结果,无充分的证据支持膝关节置换术后常规放置闭合引流这一措施。在术后切口血肿、深静脉血栓发生率及术后切口持续渗液等方面,术后放置引流与不放置引流之间无统计学差异。相反,术后放置引流增加了术后患者异体输血的几率。在术后切口感染和膝关节功能方面,尽管本系统评价得出两组间无统计学差异,但因为本系统评价和所纳入的研究的缺陷,要得出更可靠的结论,尚需更多大样本、长期随访、使用统一膝关节功能评价指标的RCT以增加证据的强度。 Objective To evaluate the earlier safety of closed suction drainage systems for knee arthroplasty. Methods All randomised or quasi-randomised trials comparing the use of closed suction drainage systems with no drainage systems for all types of knee arthroplasty were searched. The trials' quality were assessed, and data was extracted. Where appropriate, results of comparable studies were pooled. Results Twelve studies involving 1122 participants with 1191 surgical wounds were identified. The methodology of the studies identified and included in the analysis varied considerably. Pooling of results indicated no statistically significant difference in the incidence of wound haematoma, dehiscence or deep vein thrombosis between those allocated to drains and the un-drained wounds. Blood transfusion was required more frequently in those who received drains. No difference between the groups was seen with respect to wound infection and the range of movement of the joint after surgery. Conclusions There is insufficient evidence from randomised trials to support the routine use of closed suction drainage in knee arthroplasty. It results in an increase in the number of patients requiring blood transfusion. However, because of the poor trial methodology of many of the studies and the inadequate reporting of outcomes, further randomized trials on this topic are justified.
出处 《中华外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第20期1544-1549,共6页 Chinese Journal of Surgery
关键词 关节成形术 置换 引流术 系统评价 Arthroplasty, replacement, knee Drainage Systematic review
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Waugh TB,Stinchfield FE.Suction drainage of orthopaedic wounds.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1961,43:939-946.
  • 2Drinkwater CJ,Nell MJ.Optimal tinting of wound drain removalfollowing total joint arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty,1995,10:185-189.
  • 3Juni P,Altman DG,Egger M.Assessing the quality of controlled clinical trials.BMJ,2001,323:42-46.
  • 4Adalberth G,Bystrom S,Kolstad K,et al.Postoporative drainage for knee arthroplasty is not necessary; a randomized study of 90 patients.Acta Orthop Scand,1998,69:475-478.
  • 5Esler CN,Blakeway C,Fiddian NJ.The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty.A prospective,randomised study.J Bone Joint Surg Br,2003,85:215-217.
  • 6Holt BT,Parks NL,Engh GA,et al.Comparison of closedsuction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty.Orthopaedics,1997,20:1121-1125.
  • 7Jenny JY,Boeri C,Lafare S.No drainage does not increase the complication risk after total knee prosthesis implantation:a prospective,comparative,randomised study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2001,9:299-301.
  • 8Kim YH,Cho SH,Kim RS.Drainage versus nondrainage in simultaneous bilateral total knee arthroplasties.Clin Orthop Relat Res,1998(347):188-193.
  • 9Leb RB,Parker RD,Cohn BT,et al.The efficacy of closed suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty.Orthopaedic Transactions,1995,19:332-333.
  • 10陶坤,吴海山,李晓华,钱齐荣,吴宇黎,祝云利,储小兵,徐长明.闭式引流在全膝关节置换术中的作用评价[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(16):1111-1114. 被引量:32

二级参考文献14

  • 1Drinkwater CJ,Neil MJ.Optimal timing of wound drain removal following total joint arthroplasty.J Arthroplasty,1995,10:185-189.
  • 2Esler CN,Blakeway C,Fiddian NJ.The use of a closed-suction drain in total knee arthroplasty.A prospective,randomised study.J Bone Joint Surg Br,2003,85:215-217.
  • 3Holt BT,Parks NL,Engh GA,et al.Comparison of closed-suction drainage and no drainage after primary total knee arthroplasty.Orthopedics,1997,20:1121-1125.
  • 4Crevoisier XM,Reber P,Noesberger B.Is suction drainage necessary after total joint arthroplasty? A prospective study.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg,1998,117:121-124.
  • 5Ritter MA,Keating EM,Faris PM.Closed wound drainage in total hip or total knee replacement:a prospective,randomized study.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1994,76:35-38.
  • 6Jenny JY,Boeri C,Lafare S.No drainage does not increase the complication risk after total knee prosthesis implantation:a prospective,comparative,randomized study.Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc,2001,9:299-301.
  • 7Ashraf T,Darmanis S,Krikler SJ.Effectiveness of suction drainage after primary or revision total hip and total knee arthroplasty.Orthopedics,2001,24:1158-1160.
  • 8Reilly TJ,Gradisar IA Jr,Pakan W,et al.The use of postoperative suction drainage in total knee arthroplasty.Clin Orthop,1986,208:238-242.
  • 9Parker MJ,Roberts CP,Hay D.Closed suction drainage for hip and knee arthroplasty.A meta-analysis.J Bone Joint Surg Am,2004,86:1146-1152.
  • 10Mylod AG,France MP,Muser DE,et al.Perioperative blood loss associated with total knee arthroplasty.J Bone Joint Surg Am,1990,72:1010-1012.

共引文献31

同被引文献110

引证文献8

二级引证文献36

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部