期刊文献+

脓毒症患者外周血淋巴细胞PPARγ表达和活性的变化 被引量:1

Changes of PPARγ protein expression and activity in peripheral blood lymphocytes of patients with sepsis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨不同病情程度和不同预后的脓毒症患者外周血淋巴细胞过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ(peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor γ,PPARγ)的蛋白质表达量和活性的变化。方法根据2003年美国胸科医师学会/危重病医学会制定的脓毒症诊断标准,收集2007年12月至2008年3月复旦大学附属中山医院急诊科和外科ICU收治的48例脓毒症患者进行前瞻性研究,另选16例健康成年人作为对照。排除既往患有自身免疫性疾病、正在应用免疫抑制剂、AIDS和肿瘤患者。本研究获得复旦大学附属中山医院伦理委员会同意。根据患者的病情程度分为轻度脓毒症组和严重脓毒症组;根据患者28d是否存活,分为存活组和死亡组。利用Ficoll梯度离心法分离患者外周血淋巴细胞。分别采用蛋白质印迹(Western Blotting)和凝胶电泳迁移率(electrophoretic mobility shift assay,EMSA)方法测定外周血淋巴细胞PPAR7蛋白质表达量和活性变化。采用急性生理学与慢性健康评分Ⅱ(APACHEⅡ)系统对患者进行病情程度的评分。组间比较采用单因素方差分析。结果轻度脓毒症患者外周血淋巴细胞PPARγ蛋白质表达和活性(0.56±0.12,4.13±0.22)与正常对照组相比(0.39±0.07,2.42±0.17)明显增加、增强(P〈0.05);严重脓毒症患者外周血淋巴细胞PPARγ蛋白质表达量和活性明显下降(0.30±0.07,1.63±0.12),均低于正常对照组和轻度脓毒症组(P〈0.05)。与脓毒症存活组患者相比(0.54±0.11,3.59±0.34),死亡组患者PPARγ蛋白质表达量和活性明显下降(0.21±0.08,1.94±0.25),差异具有统计学意义(P〈0.05)。结论外周血淋巴细胞PPARγ蛋白质表达量和活性对于预测脓毒症患者的病情程度和预后具有一定的参考价值。 Objective To investigate the changes of PPARγ protein expression and activity of peripheral blood lymphocytes in patients with sepsis and its association with severity and prognosis of sepsis. Method According to the guidelines to sepsis set by ACCP/SCCM consensus conference in 2003, 48 patients with sepsis admitted in Emergency and Surgical ICU from December 2007 to March 2008 were enrolled in this perspective study. Sixteen healthy individuals were selected as controls. Patients with metastatic tumors, autoimmune disease, AIDS or under innnunosuppressive therapy were excluded. This study was approved by the ethical committee of Zhongshan Hospital, Fudan University. All patients were divided into mild and severe sepsis groups. Patients were also divided into snrvivor and non-survivor groups as per 28-day mortality. Peripheral blood lymphocytes were isolated by using Ficoll density gradient centrifugation. PPARγ protein expression was determined by using Western Blotting. The activity of PPARγ was analyzed by using EMSA. Differences among groups were analyzed by using oneway ANOVA. Results The protein expression and activity of PPART were significantly increased in mild sepsis patients (0,56 ± 0.12 and 4.13 ± 0.22, respectively) compared with both healthy controls (0.39 ± 0.07 and 2.42 ± 0.17, respectively) and severe sepsis patients (0.30 ± 0.07 and 1.63 ± 0.12, respectively) ( P 〈 0.05). However, the protein expression and activity of PPARγ were obviously decreased in severe sepsis patients compared with healthy individuals and mild sepsis patients ( P 〈 0.05). Survivors from sepsis had significantly higher protein expression and activity (0.54 ± 0.11 and 3.59 ± 0.34, respectively) than non-survivors (0.21 ± 0.08 and 1.94 ± 0.25, respectively) ( P 〈 0.05). Conclusions These data suggest that the protein expression and activity of PPARγ in peripheral blood lymphocytes might be valuable biomarkers in assessing the severity and outcome of patients with sepsis.
出处 《中华急诊医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期1043-1046,共4页 Chinese Journal of Emergency Medicine
基金 复旦大学青年基金(2007)
关键词 脓毒症 严重脓毒症 病情程度 预后 过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体Γ 淋巴细胞 蛋白质表达 活性 Sepsis Severe sepsis Illness severity Outcome PPARγ Protein expression Activity Lymphocyte
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Moss M,Martin GS.A global perspective on the epidemiology of sepsis[J].Intensive Care Med,2004,30(4):527-529.
  • 2Calvano SE,Xiao W,Richards DR,et al.A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans[J].Nature,2005,437 (7061):1032-1037.
  • 3Wang YX,Lee CH,Tiep S,el al.Peroxisome-proliferator-activated receptor delta activates fat metabolism to prevent obesity[J].Gell,2003,113(2):159-170.
  • 4Guyton K,Zingarelli B,Ashton S,et al.Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma agonists modulate macrpphage activation by gramnegative and gram-pesitive bacterial stimuli[J].Shock,2005,20 (1):56-62.
  • 5Dellinger RP,Carlet JM,Masur H,et al.Surviving sepsis campaign guidelines for management of severe sepsis and septic shack[J].Crit Care Med,2004,32 (3):858-873.
  • 6Guan Y,Zhang Y,Breyer MD.The role of PPARs in the transcriptional control of cellular processes[J].Drug News Perspect,2002,15(3):147-154.
  • 7Chawla A,Barak Y,Nagy L,et al.PPAR-gamma dependent and independent effects on macrophage-gene expression in lipid metabolism and inflammation[J].Nat Med,2001,7(1):48-52.
  • 8Heikkinen S,Auwerx J,Argmann CA.PPAR-gamma in human and meuse physiology[J].Biochim Biophys Acta,2007,1771 (8):999-1013.
  • 9Belvisi MG,Hele DJ.Peroxisome proliferator-activated receptors as novel targets in lung disease[J].Chest,2008,134(1):152-157.
  • 10刘东,曾邦雄,张世范,耿智隆,张诗海.罗格列酮对内毒素血症大鼠肺内炎症反应的影响[J].中华急诊医学杂志,2006,15(1):38-40. 被引量:5

二级参考文献20

  • 1Moss M, Martin GS. A global perspective on the epidemiology of sepsis [J]. Intensive Care Med,2004, 30(4) :527-529.
  • 2Nasraway SA. The problems and challenges of immunotheraphy in sepsis [J]. Chest,2003,123(5 Suppl) :451-459.
  • 3张文彤.多重线性回归模型[M].//张文彤.SPSS统计分析高级教程.北京:高等教育出版社,2004:106-111.
  • 4Napolitano LM. Immune stimulation in sepsis: to be or not to be? [ J ]. Chest,2005,127(6) : 1882-1885.
  • 5Ren Y, Wang JD, Xia J, et al. The alterations of mouse plasma proteins during septic development[J]. J proteome Res,2007,6(7) :2812-2821.
  • 6Carrigan SD, Scott G, Tabrizian M. Toward resolving the challenges of sepsis diagnosis[J]. Clinical Chemistry,2004,50(8) : 1301-1314.
  • 7Calvano SE,Xiao WZ,Richards DR,et al.A network-based analysis of systemic inflammation in humans[ J ]. Nature, 2005,437 ( 7061 ) : 1032-1037.
  • 8Pachot A, Monneret G, Voirin N, et al. Longitudinal study of cytokine and immune transcription factor mRNA expression in septic shock[J]. Clinical Immunology, 2005,114 ( 1 ) : 61-69.
  • 9Payen D, Faivre V, Lukaszewicz AC, et al. Assessment of immtmological status in the critically ill[ J ]. Minerva Anestesiol,2000,66(10) : 757-763.
  • 10Saban MR, Hellmich H, Nguyen N, et al. Time course of LPS-induced gene exprseeion in a mouse model of genitourinary inflammation [ J ]. Physiol Genomics,2001,5(3) : 147-160.

共引文献35

同被引文献13

  • 1刘东,曾邦雄,张世范.过氧化物酶体增殖物激活受体γ与脓毒症的关系[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(4):244-246. 被引量:2
  • 2盛志勇,姚咏明,林洪远.Immunologic dissonance in the pathogenesis of sepsis[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(11):641-642. 被引量:11
  • 3邵义明,姚华国,梁小仲,夏炎火.高迁移率族蛋白B1表达水平与大鼠脓毒症严重程度及预后关系的实验研究[J].中国危重病急救医学,2006,18(11):668-672. 被引量:54
  • 4Villar J, Maca-Meyer N,Perez-Mendez L,et al. Bench-to-bedside review:understanding genetic predisposition to sepsis. Crit Care, 2004,8:180-189.
  • 5Asada K, Sasaki S, Suda T, et al. Antiinflammatory roles of peroxi- some proliferator-activated receptor gamma in human alveolar macrophages. Am J Respir Crit Care Med, 2004,169 : 195-200.
  • 6Cuzzocrea S, Pisano B, Dugo L, et al. Rosiglitazone, a ligand of the peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma,reduces acute inflammation. Eur J Pharmacol, 2004,483 : 79-93.
  • 7Siddiqui AM, Cui X,Wu R, et al. The anti-inflammatory effect of curcumin in an experimental model of sepsis is mediated by up-regulation of peroxisome proliferator-activated receptor-gamma. Crit Care Med, 2006,34:1874-1882.
  • 8Wu WT, Lee CC, Lee C J, et al. Rosiglitazone ameliorates endotox- in-induced organ damage in conscious rats. Biol Res Nurs, 2011,13:38-43.
  • 9Tsujimura Y, Matsutani T, Matsuda A, et al. Effects of pioglitazone on survival and omental adipocyte function in mice with sepsis induced by cecal ligation and puncture. J Surg Res,2011,171: e215-221.
  • 10王建春,姜鹏,黄建,钱桂生.急性肺损伤大鼠肺组织PPAR-γ表达的研究[J].第三军医大学学报,2008,30(6):468-471. 被引量:8

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部