摘要
目的研究多药耐药基因(mdr1)、耐药基因谷胱甘肽S转移酶(GSTπ)在复发难治的急性早幼粒细胞白血病(APL)中的表达及意义。方法实验组:包括敏感组(As2O3治疗APL初治和持续完全缓解的患者)及耐药组(APL用As2O3治疗后复发耐药的患者);对照组:正常人的外周血。均采用荧光定量RT-PCR技术测定GSTπmRNA、mdr1的表达,比较敏感组与耐药组患者GSTπ、mdr1的表达。结果(1)APL患者GSTπ表达:耐药组为70%,敏感组为53.3%,二组阳性表达率无明显差异(P(0.05)。荧光定量分析GSTπ高表达的阳性率,耐药组中的高表达率为60.0%,敏感组中的高表达率为10.0%,耐药组GSTπ高表达率明显高于敏感组(P<0.005)。(2)12例初治患者mdr1全部为阴性表达;耐药组10例mdr1阳性表达为80%。结论As2O3治疗APL后GSTπ高表达与其临床疗效相关,GSTπ的高表达可能为APL耐药的一个指标;而mdr1在APL患者低表达或不表达,耐药组高表达,说明mdr1与As2O3的治疗及预后密切相关。而且荧光定量RT-PCR可能是更为敏感、准确的检测耐药基因GSTπ方法。
Objective: To study the expression and signification of glutathione S- transferase (GSTπ) and mdrl in resistant relaped APL. Mothods : Experiment group : sensitive group (the first - tretment patient and the remain complicated - released patients who used As203 ) and chemoresistant group (the resistant relapsed patients who used As203 ). Control group: healthy persons periphral blood These are detected by fluorescence -quantitative reverse transcription -polymerase chain reaction (RT -PCR) to compare the expression of GSTπ and mdrl between sensitive group and resistant group. Results : ( 1 ) The expression of GSTπ was 70% in resistant APL and 53.3% in sensitive APL used As203 ( P 〉 0.05 ), no obvious difference in these groups. Fluorescence - quantitative analysis : The expression rate ( 60% ) of GSTπ in resistant drug group was significal higher in sensitive drug group (10%) ( P 〈 0. 005), healthy peasons as well contain low level glutathione S- transferase (GSTπ) gene expression. (2) Mdrl expression in 12 firsttreated patients was all negative, but the positive rate was 80% in 10 drug resistant cases. Conclusion: The hiher expression of GSTπ was related with its clinical application in APL used As203. Mdrl expression was closed related with the therapy and prognosis of As203 in APL. RT - PCR will maybe the more sensitive and accurate method to detece the drug resistant gene.
出处
《中国优生与遗传杂志》
2009年第10期25-26,35,共3页
Chinese Journal of Birth Health & Heredity
基金
哈尔滨市科学研究基金项目(2005AA9CS116-4)
黑龙江省自然科学基金项目(D200672)