2American Academy of Pediatrics Task Force on Circumcision.Circumcision policy statement. Pediatrics, 1999, 103:686-693.
3Oster J. Further fate of the foreskin: incidence of preputial adhesions, phimosis, and smegma among Danish schoolboys.Arch Dis Child, 1968,43 : 200-203.
4Gairdner D. The fate of the foreskin: a study of circumcision. Br Med J,1949,2:1433-1437.
5Hiroyuki K, Hiromi T, Seiichi K, et al. Analysis of shape and retractability of the prepuce in 603 Japanese boys. J Urol, 1996,156: 1813-1815.
6Van Howe RS. Variability in penile appearance and penile findings: a prospective study. Br J Urol, 1997,80:776-782.
7Wright JE. Further to the "further fate ofthe foreskin": Update on the natural history of the foreskin. Med J Aust,1994,160:134-135.
8Hill G. Circumcision for phimosis and other medical indications in Western Australian boys. Med J Aust, 2003, 178,587.
9Rickwood AM, Walker J. Is phimosis overdiagnosed in boys and are too many circumcisions performed in consequence?Ann R Coll Surg Engl, 1989,71:275-277.
