期刊文献+

居家护理对中重型颅脑损伤患者长期预后的影响 被引量:49

The effect of home care service on the long-term outcome after moderate to severe traumatic brain injury
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨居家护理在中重型颅脑损伤患者康复中的干预作用,改善颅脑损伤患者的长期生活质量。方法选择神经外科病房102例符合条件的颅脑损伤患者作为研究对象,试验组52例,对照组50例,试验组实施出院后居家护理,包括定期电话和上门随访,提供压疮护理、管道护理、气管切开护理、康复锻炼和自我护理的方法等。对照组进行常规出院宣教和门诊复查,两组患者于出院6个月、12个月时进行Karnofsky预后评定表、日常生活能力(ADL)和生活满意度评定,并观察患者并发症的发生情况。结果观察12个月时试验组与对照组Karnofsky预后和ADL评定指标比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05),生活满意度指标差别不大(P>0.05);试验组和对照组并发症发生率差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论实施居家护理对改善颅脑损伤患者的机能状态、日常生活能力、降低患者并发症的发生率等方面有积极的作用,同时可以减轻家属的经济负担,节约医疗服务资源,为今后医院管理服务提供方向。 Objective To evaluate the effect of home care service on the long-term outcome and quality of life in patients with moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Methods A total of 102 traumatic brain injury patients were recruited and divided into two groups. The routine discharge education and further consultation were provided for the 50 patients in the control group, In addition,the home care service including bedsore care,catheter care,tracheotomy care,rehabilitative exercises,and self-care were provided for the 52 patients in the experimental group through scheduled telephone and home visit intervention. The outcomes were evaluated with Karuofsky Activity Scale (KPS),Barthel Index (BI),and Satisfaction With Life Scale (SWLS) at 6 and 12 months after the intervention. Results At the 12 months after the intervention,there was no significant difference in the score of SWLS (P〉0.05),while significant differences in the scores of KPS,BI and rate of complications between the two groups (P〈0.05). Conclusion Home care service can promote the rehabilitation of physical function and abilities of daily living as well as reduce complications in the patients after traumatic brain injury,and thereby to relieve family burden and save medical resources.
出处 《中华护理杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期965-968,共4页 Chinese Journal of Nursing
基金 嘉兴市科技立项资助项目(编号:2007AZ2010)
关键词 家庭医疗保健服务 颅脑损伤 预后 Home Care Services Craniocerebral Trauma Prognosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Chantal WP,Ewout WS,Anneke J,et al. Patient age and outcome following severe traumatic brain injury:An analysis of 5600 patients[J]. J Neurosurg, 2003,99 : 666-673.
  • 2Eija Jumisko,Jan Lexen,Siv Soderberg.The Meaning of living with traumatic brain injury in people with moderate or severe traumatic brain injury[J]. J Neurosci Nurs,2005,37(1) :42-49.
  • 3李继坪.社区护理[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001,1..
  • 4周秀华.急救护理学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001.2.
  • 5赵元立,赵继宗,富壮.颅脑损伤患者远期生存质量评估-改良功能生活指数[J].中国组织工程研究,2001,15(9):34-35. 被引量:12
  • 6南登昆.康复医学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2001,9.37-44.
  • 7张皓,张小年,芦海涛,朱镛连.创伤性颅脑损伤长期预后的评价[J].中国康复理论与实践,2006,12(2):133-134. 被引量:8
  • 8Johnston MV,Goverover Y,Dijkers M. Community activities and individuals' satisfaction with them:Quality of life in the first year after traumatic brain injury[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2005,86(4):735-745.
  • 9Dijker MP. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury A review of research approaches and findings[J]. Arch Phys Med Rehabil,2004, 85 (4) :21-35.
  • 10Jaracz K,Kozubski W. Quality of life after traumatic brain injury[J]. Neurol Neurochir Pol,2008,42(6):525-535.

二级参考文献54

共引文献444

同被引文献334

引证文献49

二级引证文献494

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部