期刊文献+

农产品质量安全中的感官质量评价和聚类分析 被引量:2

Sensory Quality Evaluation and Clustering Analysis in Agriculture Food Quality Safety Management
下载PDF
导出
摘要 针对农产品质量安全中的感官质量评价和分析问题,提出了一种基于语言信息和面板数据相结合的感官质量评价和聚类分析方法。首先将语言评价信息转换成二元语义,再对面板数据信息进行加权集结,得到综合评价结果,在此基础上进行样本和指标凝聚分层聚类分析。以山东省12个备案蔬菜种植基地的GAP推广为例进行了实证分析。研究表明以上方法可以针对农产品质量安全管理的特点,有效地将语言评价信息进行集结和利用,避免信息损失。该方法将促进良好农业规范GAP标准的推广和应用,实现农产品安全管理的目标。图2,表1,参15。 In order to solve the problem of the sensory quality evaluation and analysis in the agriculture food safety management, a clustering analysis approach based on linguistic information combining with panel data is proposed. Firstly, the linguistic assessment information is transformed into two-tuple linguistic information representation, and the panel information is aggregated to obtain the integrated evaluation values, then the cluster observations and cluster variables are developed according the above values. This research is illustrated by an example of twelve export vegetable sites which are put on records in Shandong province. The research indicates that the linguistic information can be effectively aggregated with less lost by this method, and approach will promote the extension and application in GAP, and realize the target of agricultural product safety.
出处 《农业系统科学与综合研究》 CSCD 2009年第4期458-462,共5页 System Sciemces and Comprehensive Studies In Agriculture
基金 国家自然科学基金(70571041)
关键词 农产品质量安全 感官质量 评价 聚类分析 agricultural food quality safety sensory quality evaluation clustering analysis good agriculture practice panel data two-tuple lin- guistic information
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1黄璐琦,崔光红,戴汝为.中药材GAP实施的复杂系统论[J].中国中药杂志,2002,27(1):1-3. 被引量:22
  • 2Herrera F, L Martinez. A 2 - tuple fuzzy linguistic repre-ntation model for computing with words [ J] . IEEE Transactions on Fuzzy System, 2000, 8 (6): 746-752.
  • 3姜艳萍,樊治平.基于二元语义符号运算的群决策方法[J].系统工程与电子技术,2003,25(11):1373-1376. 被引量:46
  • 4Allison A M, T Work. Fiery and frosty foods pose challenges in sensory evaluation [J] .Food Technology, 2004, 58 (5): 32 37.
  • 5H.S.Lee, M.O' Mahony. Sensory evaluation and marketing: measurement of a consumer concept [ J] . Food Quality and Preference, 2005, 16 (3): 227 235.
  • 6Civille G V, J Sehsam. Sensory evaluation methods applied to sound quality [J] .Noise Control Engineering Journal, 2003, 51 (4): 262 270.
  • 7Perez Elortondo F J, M M Ojeda. Albisu Food quality certification:An approach for the development of accredited sensory evaluation methods [ J ] . Food Quality and Preference, 2007, ( 18 ) : 425 439.
  • 8Martinez L. Sensory evaluation based on linguistic decision analysis [J].Intemational Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2007 (44) : 148- 164.
  • 9张东玲,高齐圣.基于良好农业规范(GAP)的蔬菜种植地系统评价方法[J].农业系统科学与综合研究,2008,24(1):1-6. 被引量:6
  • 10Delgado M, J L Verdegay, M A Vila. Linguistic decision making models [J] . Intemational Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1992, 7 (5) : 479 - 492.

二级参考文献30

  • 1陈华友,盛昭瀚.一类基于IOWGA算子的组合预测新方法[J].管理工程学报,2005,19(4):36-39. 被引量:74
  • 2[1]Herrera F, Martinez L. A 2-Tuple Fuzzy Linguistic Representation Model for Computing with Words[J]. IEEE Trans. on Fuzzy Systems,2000,8(6) :746 - 752.
  • 3[2]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Sequential Selection Process in Group Decision Making with Linguistic Assessment [J]. Information Science, 1995,85:233 - 239.
  • 4[3]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E. Linguistic Decision Analysis: Steps for Solving Decision Problems under Linguistic Information [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,2000,115:67-82.
  • 5[4]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. A Model of Consensus in Group Decision Making under Linguistic Assessments [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1996,79:73 - 87.
  • 6[5]Bordogna G, Fedrizzi M, Pasi G. A Linguistic Modeing of Consensus in Group Decision Making Based on OWA Operators[J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Man and Cybernetics. Part A: Systems and Humans, 1997,27(1):126- 132.
  • 7[6]Delgado M, Verdegay J L, Vila M A. On Aggregation Operations of Linguistic Label [J]. International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 1993, 8:351 - 370.
  • 8[7]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay J L. Choice Process for Nonhomogeneous Group Decision Making in Linguistic Setting [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 1998,94:287-308.
  • 9[8]Herrera F, Herrera-Viedma E, Verdegay JL. Direct Approach Processes in Group Decision Making Using Linguistic OWA Operators [J]. Fuzzy Sets and Systems,1996, 78: 73 - 87.
  • 10[9]Herrera F, Martinez L. A Model Based on Linguistic 2-Tuples for Dealing with Multigranularity Hierarchical Linguistic Contexts in Multiexpert Decision-Making [J]. IEEE Trans. on Systems, Msn and Cybernetics.Part B: Cybernetics,2001,31(2) :227 - 234.

共引文献248

同被引文献15

引证文献2

二级引证文献23

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部