期刊文献+

A cyclic behavior of CME accelerations for accelerating and decelerating events

A cyclic behavior of CME accelerations for accelerating and decelerating events
下载PDF
导出
摘要 We investigate the cyclic evolutionary behavior of CME accelerations for accelerating and decelerating CME events in cycle 23 from 1997 January to 2007 December. It is found that the absolute values of semiannual mean accelerations of both accelerating and decelerating CME events roughly wax and wane in a cycle, delaying the sunspot cycle in time phase. We also investigate the semiannual number of CMEs with positive and neg- ative acceleration and find that there are more decelerating CME events than accelerating CME events during the maximum period of a cycle (about three years), but there are more accelerating CME events than decelerating CME events during the rest of the time interval of the cycle. Our results seem to suggest that the different driving mechanisms may be acting accelerate and decelerate CME events; for accelerating CME events, the propelling force (Fp) statistically seems to play a significant role in pushing CMEs outward; for decelerating CME events, the drag (Fd) statistically seems to play a more effective role in determining CME kinematic evolution in the outer corona. During the maximum period of a cycle, because of the V^2 dependence, Fd is generally stronger; because of the magnetic field dependence, Fp is also generally stronger. Thus, the absolute values of both the negative and positive accelerations are generally larger during that time. Because of the V^2 dependence, Fd may be more effective during the maximum period of a cycle. Hence, there are more decelerating CME events than accelerating CME events during that time. During the minimum time interval of a cycle, CMEs have relatively small speeds, and Fp may be more effective. Therefore, there are more accelerating CME events than decelerating CME events during that time. We investigate the cyclic evolutionary behavior of CME accelerations for accelerating and decelerating CME events in cycle 23 from 1997 January to 2007 December. It is found that the absolute values of semiannual mean accelerations of both accelerating and decelerating CME events roughly wax and wane in a cycle, delaying the sunspot cycle in time phase. We also investigate the semiannual number of CMEs with positive and neg- ative acceleration and find that there are more decelerating CME events than accelerating CME events during the maximum period of a cycle (about three years), but there are more accelerating CME events than decelerating CME events during the rest of the time interval of the cycle. Our results seem to suggest that the different driving mechanisms may be acting accelerate and decelerate CME events; for accelerating CME events, the propelling force (Fp) statistically seems to play a significant role in pushing CMEs outward; for decelerating CME events, the drag (Fd) statistically seems to play a more effective role in determining CME kinematic evolution in the outer corona. During the maximum period of a cycle, because of the V^2 dependence, Fd is generally stronger; because of the magnetic field dependence, Fp is also generally stronger. Thus, the absolute values of both the negative and positive accelerations are generally larger during that time. Because of the V^2 dependence, Fd may be more effective during the maximum period of a cycle. Hence, there are more decelerating CME events than accelerating CME events during that time. During the minimum time interval of a cycle, CMEs have relatively small speeds, and Fp may be more effective. Therefore, there are more accelerating CME events than decelerating CME events during that time.
出处 《Research in Astronomy and Astrophysics》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第10期1165-1172,共8页 天文和天体物理学研究(英文版)
基金 supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China(Grant Nos.10573034 and 40636031) the National Key Research Science Foundation(2006CB806303)
关键词 SUN corona -- Sun coronal mass ejections (CMEs) Sun corona -- Sun coronal mass ejections (CMEs)
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献12

  • 1Ulrika Birgersdotter Green,Ashok Garg,Fawzia Al-Kandari,GilAnthony Ungab,Linda Tone,Gregory K. Feld.Successful Implantation of Cardiac Defibrillators Without Induction of Ventricular Fibrillation Using Upper Limit of Vulnerability Testing[J].Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology.2003(1)
  • 2T. Korte,H. J. Trappe,G. Gr?nefeld,B. Schulte,C. Wolpert,M. Meesmann,D. B?cker,D. Gro?e Meininghaus,J. Vogt,C. Stellbrink.Neues ICD-Morphologie-Kriterium zur Differenzierung supraventrikul?rer und ventrikul?rer Tachykardien[J].Zeitschrift für Kardiologie.2000(11)
  • 3Kuhlkamp V,Dornberger V,Mewis C,Suchalla R,Bosch RF,Seipel L.Clinical experience with the new detection algorithms for atrial fibrillation of a defibrillator with dual chamber sensing and pacing[].Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology.1999
  • 4Olson WH,Bardy GH,Mehra R.Onset and stability of ventricular tachyarrhythmia detection in an implantable pacer-cardioverter-defibrillator[].Computers in Cardiology.1987
  • 5Buxton AE,Lee KL,Fisher JD,Josephson ME,Prystowsky EN,Hafley G.A randomized study of the prevention of sudden cardiac death in patients with coronary artery disease[].The New England Journal of Medicine.1999
  • 6Nunain SO,Roelke M,Trouton T,Osswald S,Kim YH,Sosa-Suarez G,et al.Limitations and late complications of third generation automatic cardioverter-defibrillators[].Circulation.1995
  • 7Weber M,Block M,Brunn J,Bansch D,Bocker D,Hammel D,et al.Inappropriate ICD-therapies: Incidence, causes, risk factors and prevention[].Zeitschrift fur Kardiologie.1996
  • 8Schoels W,Swerdlow CD,Jung W,Stein KM,Seidl K,Haffajee CJ,et al.Worldwide clinical experience with a new dual-chamber implantable cardioverter defibrillator system[].Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology.2001
  • 9Lavergne T,Daubert JC,Chauvin M,Dolla E,Kacet S,Leenhardt A,et al.Preliminary clinical experience with the first dual chamber pacemaker defibrillator[].Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology.1997
  • 10Deisenhofer I,Kolb C,Ndrepepa G,Schreieck J,Karch M,Schmieder S,et al.Do current dual chamber cardioverter defibrillators have advantages over conventional single chamber cardioverter defibrillators in reducing inappropriate therapies? A randomized, prospective study[].Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology.2001

共引文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部