期刊文献+

Comparison of HbAlc in Chinese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes randomized to twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25 or twice daily human insulin mix 30/70 被引量:6

Comparison of HbAlc in Chinese patients with type 1 or type 2 diabetes randomized to twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25 or twice daily human insulin mix 30/70
原文传递
导出
摘要 Background Glycemic control prevents onset and progression of diabetes-related long-term complications. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25 is noninferior to twice daily human insulin mix 30/70 in achieving glycemic control as measured by hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc), from baseline to endpoint, in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Methods In this phase IV, crossover, open-label, multicenter study, 117 Chinese patients with diabetes were randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequence groups. One group received 12-week treatment with twice daily human insulin mix 30/70 followed by 12-week treatment with twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25, while the other group received the reverse treatment sequence. HbAlc, baseline-to-endpoint change in HbAlc, proportion of patients achieving target HbAlc ≤ 7% and 〈 6.5%, fasting blood glucose, and daily insulin doses were measured for each period. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results A statistically significant reduction (P≤0.0001) of HbAlc was achieved after each treatment (human insulin mix 30/70: mean HbA1c=7.91% (95% CI: 7,67%, 8.15%); insulin lispro low mix 25: mean HbA1c=7.96% (95% CI: 7.72%, 8.20%)). The 95% Cl (-0.20, 0.10) of the difference between the two treatments satisfied the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.3% (lower limit of 95% CI 〉 -0.3%). No statistically significant differences between treatments were observed for any of the secondary efficacy measures. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and hypoglycemia between the two treatments and treatment sequence groups was similar. Three serious adverse events were reported (human insulin mix 30/70 group: 2 patients (1.7%, hypoglycemic coma and cardiac failure); insulin lispro low mix 25 group: 1 patient (0.9%, stroke)). All serious adverse events were resolved and no patients died during the study. Conclusion The results support noninferiority of twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25 versus twice daily human insulin mix 30/70 in HbAlc control in Chinese patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Background Glycemic control prevents onset and progression of diabetes-related long-term complications. The objective of this study was to demonstrate that twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25 is noninferior to twice daily human insulin mix 30/70 in achieving glycemic control as measured by hemoglobin Alc (HbAlc), from baseline to endpoint, in patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes. Methods In this phase IV, crossover, open-label, multicenter study, 117 Chinese patients with diabetes were randomly assigned to one of two treatment sequence groups. One group received 12-week treatment with twice daily human insulin mix 30/70 followed by 12-week treatment with twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25, while the other group received the reverse treatment sequence. HbAlc, baseline-to-endpoint change in HbAlc, proportion of patients achieving target HbAlc ≤ 7% and 〈 6.5%, fasting blood glucose, and daily insulin doses were measured for each period. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results A statistically significant reduction (P≤0.0001) of HbAlc was achieved after each treatment (human insulin mix 30/70: mean HbA1c=7.91% (95% CI: 7,67%, 8.15%); insulin lispro low mix 25: mean HbA1c=7.96% (95% CI: 7.72%, 8.20%)). The 95% Cl (-0.20, 0.10) of the difference between the two treatments satisfied the prespecified noninferiority margin of 0.3% (lower limit of 95% CI 〉 -0.3%). No statistically significant differences between treatments were observed for any of the secondary efficacy measures. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events and hypoglycemia between the two treatments and treatment sequence groups was similar. Three serious adverse events were reported (human insulin mix 30/70 group: 2 patients (1.7%, hypoglycemic coma and cardiac failure); insulin lispro low mix 25 group: 1 patient (0.9%, stroke)). All serious adverse events were resolved and no patients died during the study. Conclusion The results support noninferiority of twice daily insulin lispro low mix 25 versus twice daily human insulin mix 30/70 in HbAlc control in Chinese patients with type 1 or 2 diabetes.
出处 《Chinese Medical Journal》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第21期2540-2546,共7页 中华医学杂志(英文版)
关键词 Chinese patient diabetes mellitus hemoglobin Al c protein human INSULIN Chinese patient diabetes mellitus hemoglobin Al c protein, human insulin
  • 相关文献

参考文献20

  • 1Gu D, Reynolds K, Duan X, Xin X, Chen J, Wu X, et al. Prevalence of diabetes and impaired fasting glucose in the Chinese adult population: International Collaborative Study of Cardiovascular Disease in Asia (InterASIA). Diabetologia 2003; 46:1190-1198.
  • 2Chan J, Ng MC, Critchley JA, Lee SC, Cockram C. Diabetes mellitus--a special medical challenge from a Chinese perspective. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2001; 54 Suppl 1: s19-s27.
  • 3The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial Research Group. The effect of intensive treatment of diabetes on the development and progression of long-term complications in insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. N Engl J Med 1993; 329: 977-986.
  • 4Epidemiology of Diabetes Interventions and Complications Trial Research Group. Intensive diabetes treatment and cardiovascular disease in patients with type 1 diabetes. N Engl J Med 2005; 353: 2643-2653.
  • 5Stratton IM, Adler AI, Neil HA, Matthews DR, Manley SE, Cull CA, et al. Association of glycaemia with macrovascular and microvascular complications of type 2 diabetes (UKPDS 35): prospective observational study. BMJ 2000; 321: 405-412.
  • 6Hirsch IB, Bergenstal RM, Parkin CG,Wright E Jr., Buse JB. A real-world approach to insulin therapy in primary care practice. Clin Diabetes 2005; 23: 78-86.
  • 7Wright E Jr., Scism-Bacon JL, Glass LC. Oxidative stress in type 2 diabetes: the role of fasting and postprandial glycaemia. Int J Clin Pract 2006; 60: 308-314.
  • 8Gather A J, Lighthelm R, Christiansen JS, Liebl A. Premixed insulin treatment for type 2 diabetes: analogue or human? Diabetes Obes Metab 2007; 9: 630-639.
  • 9Roach P, Woodworth JR. Clinical pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of insulin lispro mixtures. Clin Pharmacokinet 2002; 41 : 1043-1057.
  • 10Howey DC, Bowsher R, Brunelle RL, Woodworth J. [Lys(B28)Pro(B29)]-buman insulin: a rapidly absorbed analogue of human insulin. Diabetes 1994; 43: 396-402.

同被引文献23

二级引证文献138

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部