摘要
我国大陆和台湾地区刑法在伪造文书罪的立法规定上的差异主要在于立法模式不同、对文书含义界定不同、客观行为表述不同、伪造文书罪保护对象不同以及对无形伪造行为的规定不同等方面;其相同之处主要在于均未对本罪的主观目的作限制,在立法上均为明示所持立场。
The legislative difference on the crime of forging documents across the Taiwan Straits lies in the legislative model, the meaning of documents, the expression of objective conduct, the criminal object and the legislative expression of invisible forgery. The identity between them is neither limiting the subjective purpose nor expressing the legislative standpoint.
出处
《南都学坛(南阳师范学院人文社会科学学报)》
2009年第6期85-89,共5页
Academic Forum of Nandu:Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences of Nanyang Normal University
关键词
伪造文书罪
立法
文书
伪造
the Crime of Forging Documents
legislative
document
forge