期刊文献+

北京市环境质量改善的居民支付意愿研究 被引量:13

Residents′ willingness to pay for improving environmental quality in Beijing City
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以北京市空气质量与地表水环境质量改善的经济评价为例,采用开放式问卷的意愿调查价值评估法(CVM),通过2004年与2007年2次调查,研究了居民对环境质量改善最大支付意愿(WTP)的影响因素及变化趋势.结果表明,居民对北京空气质量和地表水环境质量改善的平均最大WTP分别从2004年的83.52-93.48,71.28-84.84元/年,提高至2007年的366.48-399.48,302.52-366.72元/年;最大WTP占家庭收入的比例分别从2004年的0.28%,0.24%,提高至2007年的1.63%-1.78%,1.35%-1.64%,居民对于工资扣除形式的支付方式的接受程度逐渐提高;收入、年龄、受教育程度以及环境介质接触程度等因素对居民环境质量改善最大WTP的影响显著. Monetary values on environmental quality in Beijing using contingent valuation method (CVM) were studied. Two surveys were conducted to find residents' willingness-to-pay (WTP) for improving air and water quality in 2004 and 2007. The questionnaire was designed in an open-ended manner. The payment vehicle was a direct payroll deduction. The annual mean WTP increased significantly in four years. Residents were willing to contribute a greater portion of their incomes to improve the environment in 2007 than in 2004. Income, age, education and exposures to the environment had significant impacts on the WTP. CVM had gradually become a feasible non-market valuation approach in China.
作者 杨宝路 邹骥
出处 《中国环境科学》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期1209-1214,共6页 China Environmental Science
基金 中国人民大学"985"项目(21305250)
关键词 意愿调查价值评估法 支付意愿 环境质量 北京市 contingent valuation method willingness to pay environmental quality Beijing City
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

二级参考文献146

  • 1徐慧,蒋明康,钱谊,彭补拙.鹞落坪自然保护区非使用价值的评估[J].农村生态环境,2004,20(4):6-9. 被引量:16
  • 2赵军,杨凯.自然资源福利计量的参数模型与表征尺度:理论与应用比较[J].自然资源学报,2004,19(6):795-803. 被引量:10
  • 3杜亚平.改善东湖水质的经济分析[J].生态经济,1996,12(6):15-20. 被引量:19
  • 4[1]Loomis J B, Walsh R G. Recreation Economic Decisions:Comparing Benefits and Costs (2nd edition) [M]. Pennsylvania: Venture Publishing Inc. , 1997.
  • 5[2]Bateman I J, Willis K G. Valuing Environmental Preferences:Theory and Practice of the Contingent Valuation Method in the US, EU, and Developing Countries [M]. New York: Oxford University Press, 1999.
  • 6[8]Mitchell D C, Carson R T. Using Surveys to Value Public Goods, the Contingent Valuation Method [M]. Washington D C: Resources for the Future, 1989. 85-102.
  • 7[9]Loomis J B. Environment valuation techniques in water resource decision making [J]. Journal of Water Resources Planning and Management, 2000, (12): 339-344.
  • 8[10]Loomis J B. Measuring the economic benefits of removing dams and restoring the Elwha River: results of a contingent valuation survey [J]. Water Resources Research, 1996, 32(2):441-447.
  • 9[11]Loomis J B, Kent P, Strange L, etal. Measuring the total economic value of restoring ecosystem services in an impaired river basin: results from a contingent valuation survey [J].Ecological Economics, 2000, 33: 103-117.
  • 10[12]Hanemann W M, Kanninen B. The statistical analysis of discrete-response CV data [R]. Department of Agricultural and Resource Economics, University of California at Berkeley.Working Paper No. 798. 1996. 3-15.

共引文献696

同被引文献169

引证文献13

二级引证文献217

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部