期刊文献+

在冠状动脉支架术后支架内再狭窄中应用运动平板试验的评估价值 被引量:2

The Value of Treadmill Testing to Evaluate In-stent Restenosis on the Patients after PCI
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的了解运动平板试验在评估冠状动脉支架术后支架内再狭窄的价值。方法81例PCI术后患者均在术后进行了运动平板试验及冠状动脉造影检查,以冠状动脉造影检查结果作为金指标,分析计算运动平板试验对于诊断支架内再狭窄的敏感性、特异性、阳性预测率、阴性预测率,及Kappa值。结果运动平板试验诊断支架内再狭窄的敏感度为52.9%,特异度为88.4%,阳性预测率为47.4%,阴性预测率为87.1%,在诊断单支病变的支架内再狭窄的敏感度66.7%,特异度96.2%,阳性预测率80%,阴性预测率92.6%,Kappa值为0.671。结论运动平板试验对于评估支架内再狭窄有一定的临床意义,尤其是在单支病变PCI术后的患者中,运动平板试验诊断支架内再狭窄与冠状动脉造影检查有较高的一致性,对于临床诊治有指导作用。 Objective To assess the value of treadmill testing to evaluate in-stent restenosis on patients after PCI(pereutaneous transluminal coronary intervention). Methods Eighty-one patients who undergone successful PCI were performed treadmill testing and CAG(coronary artery angiography).The result of CAG as the "gold standard", accounted the sensitivity, specificity, the rate of positive prognosticate, the rate of negative prognosticate and data Kappa which the treadmill testing to detect in-stent restenosis. Result The sensitivity, specificity, rate of positive prognosticate and rate of negative prognosticate was 52.9%, 88.4%, 47%, 87.1% respectively. Especially in the single-vessel group, the result was 66.7%, 96%, 80%, 92.6% respectively and the data Kappa was 0.671. Conclusion In the patients who underwent PCI, the treadmill testing could be useful to detect the in-stent restenosis. In single-vessel group, the result of the treadmill testing was consilient compare the CAG, The treadmill testing can be used in clinic to guide the patients' treatment after PCI.
出处 《中国医药指南》 2009年第21期30-31,共2页 Guide of China Medicine
关键词 运动平板 冠状动脉内支架术 再狭窄 Treadmill testing Percutaneous transluminal coronary intervention Restenosis
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献6

共引文献120

同被引文献14

  • 1荆全民,韩雅玲,王守力.双侧冠脉造影在慢性完全闭塞性病变介入治疗中的应用[J].解放军医学杂志,2005,30(3):257-257. 被引量:4
  • 2刘新,李颖,杨立,赵锡海,王新疆,赵绍宏,张玉霄,蔡祖龙.64层螺旋CT评价冠状动脉支架内再狭窄的价值[J].中华放射学杂志,2006,40(8):808-811. 被引量:44
  • 3程旭,李殿富,黄钢,王庆胜,陶如琦,冯建林.门控核素心肌断层显像评价冠状动脉支架术后血管再狭窄[J].临床心血管病杂志,2007,23(2):83-85. 被引量:6
  • 4Das KM, E1-Menyar AA, Salam AM, et al. Contrast-enhanced 64- section coronary muhidetector CT angiography versus conventional coronary angiography for stent assessment [ J ]. Radiology, 2007, 245 ( 2 ) :424 - 432.
  • 5Garzon PP, Eisenberg MJ. Functional testing for the detection of restenosis after percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty:amete-analysis[ J]. Can J Cardiol,2001,17 :41 - 48.
  • 6Achenbach S, Giesler T, Ropers D,et al. Detection of coronary artery stenoses by contrast-enhanced, retrospectively electrocardio- graphically-gated, multislice spiral computed tomography [ J ]. Cir- culation ,2001,103 ( 21 ) :2535 - 2538.
  • 7Schuijf JD, Bax JJ, Jukema JW, et al. Feasibility of assessment of coronary stent patency using 16-slice computed tomography [ J ]. Am J Cardio1,2004 ,94 :427 - 430.
  • 8Manghat N,van Lingen R, Hewson P, et al. Usefulness of 64-de- rector row computed tomography for evaluation of intraeoronary stents in symptomatic patients with suspected in-stent restenosis [ J ]. Am J Cardio1,2008,101 ( 11 ) : 1567 - 1573.
  • 9Dori G, Denekamp Y, Fishman S, et al. Exercise stress testing, myocardial perfusion imaging and stress echocardiography for detecting restenosis after successful percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty : a review of performance [ J ]. J Intern Med, 2003,253 (3) :253 -262.
  • 10蒲锘,蒲红,蒋瑾,陶客言.双源CT冠状动脉造影:成像质量因素分析[J].成都医学院学报,2009,4(1):14-16. 被引量:7

引证文献2

二级引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部