期刊文献+

钢筋混凝土框架异型中节点抗震性能影响因素分析 被引量:3

ANALYSIS OF EFFECT FACTOR ON SEISMIC BEHAVIOR OF ABNORMAL INTERIOR JOINTS IN REINFORCED CONCRETE FRAME STRUCTURES
原文传递
导出
摘要 通过6个钢筋混凝土框架异型中节点试件在低周反复荷载作用下的试验,分析节点核心区尺寸、轴压比等因素对异型节点抗震性能的影响。研究表明:上柱截面发生变化对异型节点抗震性能的影响不明显,当其变化量小于1/6柱高时,即Δhc<hc/6,可忽略其不利作用;小梁截面发生变化对组合体试件的抗震性能影响较大,当大小梁截面高差在1/6柱高到2/5梁高时,即hc/6<Δhb<2hbl/5,随着大小梁高差的增大,组合体的抗震性能将逐渐改善;当2hbl/5<Δhb<hbl/2时,随着大小梁高差的增大,组合体的抗震性能将逐渐劣化;当Δhb>hbl/2时,建议按中间层边节点考虑。此外,轴压比增大对异型节点通裂阶段后组合体试件的抗震性能产生不利影响,对该类节点进行抗震设计时,建议轴压比应小于0.3。 Six specimens of abnormal interior joints were tested under reversed cyclic loading. Experimental studies were carried out to investigate the effect of joint core dimensions and axial compression ratio on seismic behaviour of abnormal joints. Test results indicated that column section abrupt had little effect on seismic behavior of the specimen. When the reduced height of column section was less than 1/6 column section height, that is Δhc 〈 h c/6, the negative effect of that could be neglected. The test results also indicated that beam section abrupt had an obvious effect on seismic behavior of the beam-column subassemblage. When Δhb was between hc/6 and 2b1/5, the seismic behavior improved gradually with the increase of Δhb; When Δhb was between 2hb1/5 and hb1/2, the seismic behavior deteriorated with the increase of Δhb; When Δhb was greater than 1/2 high beam section depth, a exterior joint model would be better for this case analysis. In addition, the axial load level of the column had a negative effect on seismic behavior of abnormal joints after the beamcolumn subassemblage reached to critical crack stage, it was suggested that the axial compression ratio shoulds be less than 0. 3 for the seismic design of this sort of abnormal joint.
出处 《工业建筑》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期30-34,89,共6页 Industrial Construction
基金 国家自然科学基金(50608004) 高等学校博士点基金(20060710004)
关键词 框架异型中节点 抗震性能 轴压比 abnormal interior frame joint seismic behaviours axial compression ratio
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献3

共引文献16

同被引文献22

  • 1张淑云,白建方,白国良.基于神经网络的钢筋混凝土异型节点抗裂能力预测[J].世界地震工程,2005,21(4):54-59. 被引量:1
  • 2Collins M P, Mitchell D, Adebar P, Vecchio F J. The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1996, 93(1): 36-45.
  • 3Vecchio F J, Collins M E The modified compression field theory for reinforced concrete elements subjected to shear [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1986, 83(2): 219-231.
  • 4Jirsa J O. Shear in joints and other places [J]. Recent Developments in Lateral Force Transfer in Buildings, SP-157-3, ACI, 1995: 59-73.
  • 5Vecchio F J, Collins M P. Predicting the response of reinforced concrete beams subjected to shear using modified compression field theory [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 1988, 85(3): 258-268.
  • 6Bentz E C, Vecchio F J, Collins M E Simplified modified compression field theory for calculating shear strength of reinforced concrete elements [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2006, 103(4): 614-624.
  • 7Joh O, Goto Y, Shibata T. Behavior of reinforced concrete beam-column joints with eccentricity [J]. Design of Beam-Column Joints for Seismic Resistance, SP-123, ACI, 1991.
  • 8Shin M, LaFave J M. Modeling of cyclic joint shear deformation contributions in RC beam-column Connections to overall frame behavior [J]. Structural Engineering and Mechanics, 2004, 18(5): 645-669.
  • 9Hwang S J, Lee H J. Analytical model for predicting shear strengths of interior reinforced concrete beam-column joints for seismic resistance [J]. ACI Structural Journal, 2000, 97(1): 35-44.
  • 10GB50010-2002.混凝土结构设计规范[S].[S].,..

引证文献3

二级引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部