期刊文献+

强制外交:西方国家军事外交的核心内涵--兼论中国军事外交不同于西方强制外交的哲学基础 被引量:1

Coercive Diplomacy:the Core of Western Military Diplomacy,the Differences of Philosophical Base between China's and Western Military Diplomacy
下载PDF
导出
摘要 西方国家的军事外交的核心内涵是"强制",表现为"强制外交"。而中国军事外交概念则突出"交往",中国把加强互信、促进真正的和平作为军事外交的根本目的。西方国家军事外交建立在人性恶和权力政治基础之上,因此其内在表现则具有很强的胁迫性,而中国的军事外交则是建立在"善"的传统儒家交往思想,以及当代中国的和平共处五项原则和"互信、互利、平等、协作"的新安全观基础上,实践中具有多样性、平等性、互利性、合作性和预防性等特点。西方国家把正常平等的军事交往或预防性的军事外交作为策略考虑,通过军事外交达到了解对手并最终控制对手的目的。而中国的军事外交通过交流和合作的方式,谋求国际社会的共同合作和共同发展,把安全和发展结合,把自身和外界利益紧密联系,彰显"不自生,故能长生"的战略智慧。 With coercion as the core,military diplomacy in the West is actually 'coercive diplomacy' ,while China's concept of military diplomacy ,emphasizes exchange,never highlighting adversary or enemy. China regards the strengthening of mutual trust and promotion of peace as his basic goal. Western military diplomacy is built upon the concept of evilness of human nature and power politics,so its nature involves strong coerciveness. Instead,China's military diplomacy is based on traditional concept of good which is the idea of Confucianism,and the contemporary Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and new security theory,featuring variety,equality,mutual benefit,cooperation and prevention in practice. The West considers military exchanges or preventive military diplomacy as tactics,through which they can understand their adversaries and finally control them. China's military diplomacy,however,is to achieve cooperation and development with international society through exchanges and cooperation. China links internal security issue with development issue and integrates its own interest with outside interest. The behaviors show a strategic wisdom of 'not seeking self interest,so surviving forever.'
作者 肖刚 何广华
出处 《国际论坛》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期1-7,共7页 International Forum
基金 国家社会科学基金阶段成果,批准号:05BKS007
  • 相关文献

参考文献42

  • 1Valeri Ratchev, "Dcfencc Diplomacy: The Bulgarian Experience",in T. Edmunds and M. Maleiic, eds. , Defence Transform action in Europe : Evolving Military Roles, United Kingdom:IOS Press, 2005, p. 60.
  • 2郭新宁.试论军事外交的概念、定位及功能[J].外交评论(外交学院学报),2009,26(3):48-57. 被引量:16
  • 3[美]罗伯特·J·阿特,罗伯特·杰维斯编.《国际政治--常在概念和当代问题(第七版)》[M],时殷弘,吴征宇译,中国人民大学出版社,2007年版,第162页,第178页,第182页.
  • 4Douglas Mcgready, "Coercive Diplomacy in U. S. Foreign Policy", Military Review, Sep/Oct 2005, Vol. 85, Iss. 5, p. 84.
  • 5Alexander L. George, et al. , The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy, Boston: Little, Brown, 1971, p. 24.
  • 6Bruce W. Jentleson,"The Regan Administration and Coercive Diplomacy: Restraining More Than Remaking Governments", Political Science Quarterly, Spring 1991,106,1, p. 57.
  • 7[美]罗伯特·J·阿特,罗伯特·杰维斯编.《国际政治--常在概念和当代问题(第七版)》,第179页.
  • 8Bruce W. Jentleson, "The Regan Administration and Coercive Diplomacy: Restraining More Than Remaking Governments", p. 80.
  • 9《牛津高阶英汉双解词典》[M],商务印书馆,2002年第四增补版,第22页.
  • 10马基雅维里.《罗马史论》[M],(法文)版,第1编,第57章.

二级参考文献35

  • 1张炜.关于中国军事外交的理论探讨[J].中国军事科学,2004,17(3):27-36. 被引量:7
  • 2周桂银.冷战时期中国周边安全环境的特征与启示[J].当代中国史研究,2002,9(6):75-87. 被引量:9
  • 3United Kingdom,Defence Diplomacy,Military of Defence Policy Paper,No.1.
  • 4[英]杰夫·贝里奇、艾伦·詹姆斯:《外交辞典》,高飞译,北京:北京大学出版社,2008年,第72页
  • 5Teo Chee Hean,"Defending Singapore:Strategies for a Small State",http://www,mindef,gov.sg/mindef/news_and_events/nr/2005/apr/21 apr05_nr2,html.
  • 6Valeri Ratchev,Defence Diplomacy:The Bulgarian Experience,in T.Edmunds and M.Malesic,eds.,DefenceTransformation in Europe:Evolving Military Roles,United Kingdom:IOS Press,2005,p.60.
  • 7傅加平.《论和平与发展形势下的国防外交》[J].中国军事科学,1994,(4):55-55.
  • 8顾德钦主编:《国际军事关系》,《中国军事百科全书》(第二版),学科分册I,北京:中国大百科全书出版社,2007年,第14页.
  • 9阿什利·泰利斯等:《国家实力评估:资源绩效军事能力》,门洪华、黄福武泽,北京:新华出版社,2002年,第242页.
  • 10Max G.Manwaring,ed.,Security and Civil-military Relations in the New World Disorder:The Use of Armed Forces in the Americas,Carlisle Barracks,PA,Strategic Studies Institute,1999,p.43.

共引文献840

同被引文献33

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部