摘要
"探路者公司帐篷被哄抢"事件引发了公众对于灾民哄抢行为罪与非罪界定的讨论,紧急避险的抗辩和权利冲突理论告诉我们极穷状态下的哄抢行为并非犯罪,因为此时对生命的尊重与保障处于最为优先的地位,而划清罪与非罪界限的关键节点则在于对极穷状态的界定。
The incident that tents of Explorer Company were snatched has brought out public discussion about the legal or illegal definition of snatching act of victims of a natural calamity. Demurrer of urgent danger prevention and theory of right conflict tell us the snatching act is not a crime under the condition of being broken to the world, so the respect and protection of life should be put in preferential position, and the key to make a clear distinction between legal and illegal is how to define being broken to the world.
出处
《贵州警官职业学院学报》
2009年第5期32-36,共5页
Journal of Guizhou Police Officer Vocational College
关键词
极穷状态
紧急避险
权利冲突
being broken to the world
urgent danger prevention
right conflict