期刊文献+

位置与标识分离的命名和寻址体系结构研究综述 被引量:12

Survey of Naming and Addressing Architecture Based on Locator/Identifier Split
下载PDF
导出
摘要 随着互联网的发展,传统TCP/IP网络体系结构的IP地址语义过载问题所导致的移动性、扩展性和安全性等方面的缺陷逐渐暴露出来,并限制了多宿主、流量工程等新技术的发展.针对这一问题,学术界普遍认为需要对下一代互联网的命名和寻址体系结构进行重新设计,将位置与标识分离作为新一代互联网的基本设计原则之一.近年来,涌现了许多基于位置与标识分离的新技术和解决方案.首先对基于位置与标识分离的网络体系结构研究所面临的关键性问题进行了分析;然后对相关研究工作进行了回顾,并对相关代表性研究成果进行了深入评述;最后展望了未来的一些研究方向. With the development of the Internet, some drawbacks of the original TCP/IP architecture on mobility, scalability and security have been exposed gradually. One of the most important reasons is the problem of semantic overloading of IP address. Current IP address has dual semantic functions, which indicates both the network node's routing locator and its endpoint identifier. The "IP overload" also limits the development of several new technologies including multi-homing, traffic engineering, etc. To tackle this problem, many researchers believe that it is necessary to build a clean-slate design of the naming and addressing architecture for the future Internet. The reason of the above drawbacks lies in the fact that there is no accurate, unique and permanent identifier to describe a network node. IAB (Internet Architecture Board) announced that in order to resolve the "IP overload", two name spaces should be introduced to denote a network node's locator and identifier separately, which is called "locator/identifier split". In recent years, many new techniques and approaches have emerged based on this principle. The authors analyze some challenging problems in the research of network architecture based on "locator/identifier split", and give a review of related works. Comments on some representative research proposals are also presented. Finally, some future research directions and further discussion are listed.
出处 《计算机研究与发展》 EI CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期1777-1786,共10页 Journal of Computer Research and Development
基金 国家"九七三"重点基础研究发展计划基金项目(2009CB320503) 国家"八六三"高技术研究发展计划基金项目(2008AA01A325)~~
关键词 命名与寻址 位置与标识分离 扩展性 移动性 安全性 多宿主 流量工程 naming and addressing locator/identifier split scalability mobility security multi-homing traffic engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献43

  • 1Sollins K. Architectural principles of uniform resource name resolution. RFC2276, 1998.
  • 2Sollins K, Masinter L. Functional requirements for uniform resource names. RFC1737, 1994.
  • 3Moats. R. URN syntax. RFC2141, 1997.
  • 4Daniel R. Resolution of uniform resource identifiers using the domain name system. RFC2168, 1997.
  • 5Winoto WA. The design and implementation of an intentional naming system. Operating Systems Review, 1999,34(5):186-201.
  • 6Clark D. The design philosophy of the DARPA internet protocols. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGCOMM. 1988. 106-114.
  • 7Ramasubramanian V, Sirer EG. The design and implementation of a next generation name service for the Internet. In: Proc. of the ACM SIGCOMM. 2004.331-342.
  • 8Ratnasamy S, Shenker S, Stoica I. Routing algorithms for DHTs: Some open questions. In: Proc. of the Int'l Workshop on Peer-To-Peer Systems 2002 (IPTPS 2002). 2002.45-52.
  • 9Ramasubramanian V, Sirer EG. Beehive: Exploiting power law query distributions for O(1) lookup performance in peer to peer overlays. In: Proc. of the USENIX Symp. on Networked Systems Design and Implementation 2004 (NSDI 2004). 2004.331-342.
  • 10Cohen E, Kaplan H. Proactive caching of DNS records: Addressing a performance bottleneck. In: Proc. of the 2001 Symp. on Applications and the Internet 2001 (SAINT 2001). 2001.85-94.

共引文献23

同被引文献69

引证文献12

二级引证文献41

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部