期刊文献+

形式主义与历史主义的弥合——海登·怀特历史诗学的跨学科视野

The Integration of Formalism and Historicism——A Multidisciplinary Perspective of Hayden White's Historical Poetics
下载PDF
导出
摘要 形式主义与历史主义作为两种批评方法从某种程度上呈现出尖锐的矛盾,但怀特通过"文学性"策略使这对极其矛盾的批评方法在其历史诗学中获得了奇妙的统一:其历史著述的文本属性弥合了历史文本与文学文本;其历史文本的存在方式弥合了"外部研究"与"内部研究";其历史诗学的建构形态弥合了诗性预设与理性阐释。通过实现形式主义与历史主义的弥合,怀特的历史诗学成为跨学科的典范。 As two critical methods, formalism and historicism are in conflict with each other. However, Hayden White uses his literary strategy to make both contradictory criticisms integrated into a surprising unity in his historical poetics. The textuality of his historical works unites the historicality and literariness; his historical texts are combined with external and internal study; his construction of historical poetics is connected with poetical presupposition and theoretical explanation. Through the integration of formalism and historicism, White's historical poetics seems typical of muhidisciplinary study.
作者 董馨
出处 《佛山科学技术学院学报(社会科学版)》 2009年第5期59-63,共5页 Journal of Foshan University(Social Science Edition)
基金 广东省哲学社会科学基金规划项目(05J-04)
关键词 形式主义 历史主义 文学性 历史诗学 formalism historicism literariness historical poetics
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

  • 1海登·怀特.元史学:十九世纪欧洲的历史想象[M].陈新,译.南京:译林出版社,2004.
  • 2伊丽莎白·福克斯-杰诺韦塞.文学批评和新历史主义的政治[A].张京媛主编.新历史主义与文学批评[C].北京大学出版社,1993.P62.
  • 3H.怀特,陈新.西方历史编纂的形而上学[J].世界哲学,2004(4):50-58. 被引量:11
  • 4雷·韦勒克,奥·沃伦.文学理论[M].北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1984.
  • 5林庆新.历史叙事与修辞——论海登·怀特的话语转义学[J].国外文学,2003(4):3-10. 被引量:15
  • 6海登·怀特.形式的内容——叙事话语与历史再现[M].董立河,译.北京:文津出版社,2005.
  • 7海登·怀特.后现代历史叙事学[M].陈永国,张万娟译.北京:中国社会科学出版社.2003.
  • 8理查德·罗蒂.后形而上学希望——新实用主义社会、政治和法律哲学[M].张国清,译.上海:上海译文出版社,2003:29.
  • 9柯林武德.形而上学论[M].宫睿译.北京:北京大学出版社,2007.
  • 10加斯东·巴什拉.梦想的诗学[M].刘自强译.北京:生活·读书·新知三联书店,1996.124.

二级参考文献14

  • 1[12]Hayden White, Tropics of Discourse: Essays in Cultural Criticism(Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1978), p.233,pp. 126 - 7.
  • 2关于福柯对"考古学"方法的讨论,参见The Order ofThings :An Archaeology of Human Sciences (New York: Vintage Books, 1994), pp. xxii-xxiii; The Archaeology of Knowledge ( London: Tavistock Publications Limited, 1972), pp. 167 - 77 .关于福柯为何使用"考古学"这个术语,参见Foucault Live ( New York: Semiotext ( e), 1989), pp. 57 - 8.
  • 3[10]Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of Human Scieaces ( New York: Vintage Books, 1994), p. xxii, p. xiv.
  • 4Hayden White,"Foucault Decoded:Notes from Underground" in Tropics of Discourse, pp. 230 - 260.
  • 5[6][16][18][19][20]Hayden White, Figural Realism: Studies in the Mimesis Effect ( Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1999),p.21,p.9,pp.7 - 8,pp.51 - 2,p.22,p.9.
  • 6[8][14]Hayden White, Metahistory : The Historical Imagination in the Nineteenth Century Europe ( Baltimore & London: The Johns Hopkins UP, 1973), p. 34, pp. 34 - 7,p.6.
  • 7怀特在《元历史》中声称该书是对"历史想象的深层结构的分析."见ix页;2页.
  • 8Michel Foucault, The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences ( New York: Vintage Books, 1994), p. xiv.
  • 9[22][23]Hayden White, The Content of the Form: Narrative Discourse and Historical Representation (Baltimore & London, The Johns Hopkins UP, 1987), p. 28, p. ix, p. xi.
  • 10关于年代纪、编年史和历史的区别,见Hayden White, "The Value of Narrativity in the Representation of Reality" in The Content of the Form, pp. 1 - 25 .

共引文献111

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部