期刊文献+

基于独立环境报告的中日石油企业环境绩效信息披露比较研究 被引量:25

Research on Oil Company's Environmental Performance Information Disclosure in Separated Environmental Reports
下载PDF
导出
摘要 有效的环境绩效信息披露是正确进行企业环境绩效评估的基础。本文首次依据全球报告倡议组织(GRI)《可持续发展报告指南》(2006年版)中的30个环境绩效指标,对中石油独立环境报告中环境绩效信息披露的研究发现,中石油环境绩效指标披露不完整,重要的核心指标披露情况更不理想,年度间纵向比较还出现了倒退;定性指标披露多于定量指标;体现企业积极行动和效果的内容和数据披露得相对较为详细;存在选择性披露问题,可比性较差,相关信息披露也较为散乱,不利于读者进行环境绩效评估。对此,我国企业应重视环境原始信息的收集和处理,将环境相关信息纳入企业日常的信息管理系统,在披露方法上则应综合借鉴相关国际组织的做法并不断加以改进;政府监管部门也应对环境信息披露做出系统指引和规范,并积极推动环境报告审计的发展。 Effective environmental performance information disclosure is an important basis for enviromental performance evaluation. Based on the environmental performance information in oil company's separate environmental report and the 30 environmental performance indicators of Global Reporting Initiative(GRI), this article found that, most important environmental performance indicators are not fully disclosed and those disclosed are qualitative instead of quantitative. Company even discloses fewer indicators year after year. What' s more, positive activities and indicators are more elaborated. Information is scattered. All of these lead to the incomparability and difficulty of environmental performance evaluation. To improve environmental performance information disclosure, enterprises should incorporate environmental information into their information management system and integrate the better disclosure methods as well as performance indicators proposed by ISO and WBCSD other than GRI. The regulatory authority should better issue related guidelines and enhance related assurance.
作者 何丽梅
出处 《中国人口·资源与环境》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期97-102,共6页 China Population,Resources and Environment
基金 北京市优秀教学团队<会计学专业系列课程教学团队>(编号:PHR200907203) 教育部人文社科研究青年基金项目(环境绩效信息披露 利益相关者回应及改进--基于企业社会责任报告的视角) 北京市委组织部优秀人才资助项目(编号:20071D0500200139) 学科与研究生教育--工商管理(一级学科PXM2009-014212-078362) 北方工业大学科研基金资助成果
关键词 环境绩效信息 独立环境报告 选择性披露 可比性 environmental performance information separate environmental report selective disclosure comparability
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献30

  • 1陈静,林逢春.国际企业环境绩效评估指标体系与我国相关法规相容性分析[J].环境保护,2004,32(11):58-61. 被引量:10
  • 2温素彬,薛恒新.企业“三重盈余”绩效评价指标体系[J].统计与决策,2005,21(03X):126-128. 被引量:26
  • 3周毅.21世纪中国人口与资源、环境、农业可持续发展[M].太原:山西经济出版社,1999..
  • 4Carroll A B. 1979. A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. Academy of management Review, 4(4) : 497-505.
  • 5Elkington J. 1998. Partnerships from Cannibals with Forks: The Triple Bottom Line of 21st-Century Business. Environmental Quality Management, 8 (1) : 37 -51.
  • 6Kaplan R S, Norton D P. 1992. The balanced scorecard - measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1): 71-79.
  • 7Neely A, Adams C. 2002. The performance prism: The scorecard for measuring and managing business success. London: FT Prentice Hall.
  • 8Stem J M, Stewart G B. 1996. EVA: An integrated financial management system. European Financial Management, 2 (2) :223 - 245.
  • 9Wartick S L, Cochran P L. 1985. The evolution of the corporate social performance model. Academy of Management Review,10 (4): 758-769.
  • 10.环发[2003]101号.关于对申请上市的企业和申请再融资的上市企业进行环境保护核查的通知[Z].,2003..

共引文献240

同被引文献200

二级引证文献181

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部