期刊文献+

论类型逻辑语法的多种表述 被引量:2

On Presentations of Type-Logical Grammar
原文传递
导出
摘要 There are three basic methods presenting type-logical grammar:axiomatic presentation,Gentzen presentation and ND presentation(i.e. natural deduction presentation) . The presentations have the equal ability of deduction,but each has its own function. Axiomatic presentation would become a multi-modal logic system by being equipped with frame semantics. It is mainly used to discuss the soundness and completeness based on frame semantics. Gentzen presentation would make it easy to search finitely the proofs of theorems and it is specifically designed to solve the problem of decidability. ND presentation reflects the view that grammar is equal to logic and it would make type-calculus intuitive. In the end,we commented another presentation,i.e. ND presentation of labeled tree format. There are three basic methods presenting type-logical grammar:axiomatic presentation,Gentzen presentation and ND presentation(i.e. natural deduction presentation) . The presentations have the equal ability of deduction,but each has its own function. Axiomatic presentation would become a multi-modal logic system by being equipped with frame semantics. It is mainly used to discuss the soundness and completeness based on frame semantics. Gentzen presentation would make it easy to search finitely the proofs of theorems and it is specifically designed to solve the problem of decidability. ND presentation reflects the view that grammar is equal to logic and it would make type-calculus intuitive. In the end,we commented another presentation,i.e. ND presentation of labeled tree format.
出处 《哲学研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第11期119-125,共7页 Philosophical Research
基金 北京市哲学社会科学"十一五"规划项目(编号06BaZX022)的资助
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Carpenter, B., 1997, Type-Loglcal Semantics, Cambridge/London: MIT Press.
  • 2Jager, G. , 2003, "Resouce sharing in type logical grammar", in Geert-Jan Kruijff and Richard Oehrle( eds. ), Resouce-sernsitivity, Binding and Anaphora, Dordrecht/Boston/London: Kluwer.
  • 3Jager, G. 2005, Anaphora and Type Logical Grammar, Netherlands: Springer.
  • 4Lambek, J. , 1958, "The mathematics of sentence structure", in American Mathematical Monthly 65.
  • 5Moortgat, M. , 1997, "Categorical type logics", in J. van Benthem and A. ter Meulen (eds.) , Handbook of Logic and Language, Netherlands, Elsevier.
  • 6Moortgat, M.2005a, "Categorical grammar: lecture 1" from URL http://www.let. uu. nl.
  • 7Moortgat, M.2005b, "Categorical grammar: lecture 0 -5", from URL http ://www. let. uu. nl.
  • 8Moot, R. , 2002, The Proof net for Linguistic Analysis, the Dissertation of PhD in Utrecht University.

同被引文献6

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部