期刊文献+

北京市农业景观生态与美学质量空间评价 被引量:20

Spatial evaluation on ecological and aesthetic quality of Beijing agricultural landscape
原文传递
导出
摘要 选择了重点反映农业景观生态与美学功能的生态系统功能、自然性、开阔与多样性、污染概率和整洁度等10个单一空间显性指数,基于田间调查和专家系统赋予其不同权重,构建了农业景观质量综合评价指标,并基于地理信息系统支持下的土地利用数据和利用遥感获得的植被指数,对北京市农业景观质量及其空间差异进行了评价.结果表明:北京市农业景观质量的区域差别较大,城区及小城镇边缘的农业景观质量最差,近郊外围及远郊区较好;北京市农业景观的优劣主要与地形和人为压力有关.基于空间信息技术和景观指数,在大尺度上构建的综合指标体系,对评价农业景观质量的空间差异具有重要意义. A total of ten single indices mainly reflecting the ecological and aesthetic quality of agri-cultural landscape, including ecosystem function, naturalness, openness and diversity, contamination probability, and orderliness were selected, their different weights were given based on field survey and expert system, and an integrated evaluation index system of agricultural landscape quality was constructed. In the meantime, the land use data provided by GIS and the remote sensing data of vegetation index were used to evaluate the Beijing agricultural landscape quality and its spatial variation. There was a great spatial variation in the agricultural landscape quality of Beijing, being worse at the edges of urban area and towns, but better in suburbs. The agricultural landscape quality was mainly related to topography and human activity. To construct a large-scale integrated index system based on remote sensing data and landscape indices would have significance in evaluating the spatial variation of agricultural landscape quality.
出处 《应用生态学报》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第10期2455-2460,共6页 Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology
基金 国家科技支撑计划项目(2006BAJ10B05 2007BAD87B01) 北京市农委和农业局农田景观项目资助
关键词 都市农业 农业景观 空间评价 遥感 地理信息系统 urban agriculture agricultural landscape spatial evaluation remote sensing geographic information system.
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1宇振荣,胡敦孝,王建武.试论农田边界的景观生态功能[J].生态学杂志,1998,17(3):53-58. 被引量:38
  • 2陈利顶,傅伯杰,张淑荣,丘君,郭旭东,杨福林.异质景观中非点源污染动态变化比较研究[J].生态学报,2002,22(6):808-816. 被引量:61
  • 3Wang XH, Yin CQ, Shah BQ. The role of diversified landscape buffer structures for water quality improvement in an agricultural watershed, North China. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2005, 107:381 -396.
  • 4Milne R J, Bennett LP. Biodiversity and ecological value of conservation lands in agricultural landscapes of southern Ontario, Canada. Landscape Ecology, 2007, 22 : 657-670.
  • 5Antrop M. Background concepts for integrated landscape analysis. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 2000, 77:17-18.
  • 6Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. Multifunctionality : Towards An Analytical Framework [ EB/OL]. (2001-04-01) [ 2009-08-03 ]. http ://www. oecd. org/dataoecd/43/31/1894469, pdf.
  • 7Hawkins V, Selman P. Landscape scale planning: Exploring ahernative land use scenarios. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2002, 60:211-224.
  • 8Dramstad WE, Fry G, Fjellstad WJ, et al. Integrating landscape-based values - Norwegian monitoring of agricultural landscapes. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2001, 57:257-268.
  • 9Dramstad WE, Sundli Tveit M, Fjellstad WJ, et al. Relationships between visual landscape preferences and map-based indicators of landscape structure. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2006, 78:465-474.
  • 10Iiyama N, Kamada M, Nakagoshi N. Ecological and social evaluation of landscape in a rural area with terraced paddies in southwestern Japan. Landscape and Urban Planning, 2005, 73:60-71.

二级参考文献132

共引文献968

同被引文献333

引证文献20

二级引证文献271

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部