期刊文献+

DCT和GAT对LASIK手术前后眼压的比较性研究

Analysis of the changes ofintraocular tension after myopic laser in situ keratomileusis using DCT and GAT
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评价动态轮廓眼压计(DCT)和Goldmann压平眼压计(GAT)对在准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术(LASIK)手术前后眼压测量值的变化。方法取71例141只眼近视患者在LASIK术前和术后一周分别进行角膜厚度(CCT)、GAT、DCT测量。结果①LASIK手术前后DCT测得值无显著性差异(陆0.062),GAT测得值有显著性差异(P〈0.001),CCT测得值有显著性差异(P〈0001)。(2)Bland—Ahman分析示LASIK手术前后DCT与GAT两种测量方法均呈现高度一致性。术前DCT测量值高于GAT测量值1.1mmHg,95%可信区间为(-0.6,2.8)mmHg;术后DCT测量值高于GAT测量值8.2mmHg,95%可信区间为(5.3,11.1)mmltg。③△GAT与△CCT呈正相关,△DCT与△CCT无统计相关性。结论DCT测量值不受LASIK手术切削的影响,更适合于LASIK手术前后眼压的测量。 Objective To compare IOP measurements using Goldmann applanation tonometry (GAT) and Dynamic contour tonometer (DCT) in eyes undergoing LASIK for correction of myopia. Methods In prospective, 71 patients ( 141 eyes) were treated by LASIK for myopia, central corneal thickness (CCT) and IOP were measured in patients before and after surgery. IOP was measured using GAT and DCT. The un- treated eyes before surgery served as paired controls.Results (1) A significant difference in IOP readings measured by GAT was detected before and after LASIK, as well as CCT readings. In contrast, no significant change in IOP readings was recorded by DCT. (2) There was good concordance between the two tonometers in 141 normal eyes before and after LASIK. Bland-Altman analysis of individual pairs of DCT and GAT measurements before and after LASIK revealed a bias of 1.1 mmHg, [95 % confidence interval from -0.6 mmHg to 2.8mmHg] and a bias of 8.2 mmHg [95 % confidence interval from 5.3 mmHg to 11. 1mmHg]. (3) Corneal ablation reduced lOP readings as measured by GAT. In contrast, no significant change in IOP readings was recorded by DCT. Conclusions lOP readings recorded by DCT were not be affected by LASIK for myopia. Thus, DCT is more suitable to measure lOP before and after surgery.
出处 《中国实用眼科杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第11期1246-1248,共3页 Chinese Journal of Practical Ophthalmology
关键词 动态轮廓眼压计 Goldmann压平跟压计 准分子激光原位角膜磨镶术 Goldmann applanation tonometry Dynamic contour tonometer laser in situ keratomileusis
  • 相关文献

参考文献17

  • 1Siganos DS, Papastergiou GI, Moedas C.Assessment of the Pascal dynamic contour tonometerin monitoring intraocular pressure in unoperated eyes and operated eyes after LASIK.J CataractRefract Stag 2005; 31:458-459.
  • 2Duba I, Wirthlin AC.Dynamic contour tonometry for post-LASIK intraocular pressure measurements.Kiln Monatsbl Augenheilkd2004; 221:347-350.
  • 3Kaufman C, Bachmann LM, Thiel MA.Intraocular pressure measurements using dynamic contour tonometry after laser in situ keratomileusis.Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci,2003 ;44:3790-3794.
  • 4Kniestedt C, Nee M, Stamper RL.Accuracy of dynamic contour tonometry compared with applanation tonometry in human cadaver eyes of different hydration states.Graefes Arch Clin ExpOphthalnml ,2005 ; 2d3 : 359-366.
  • 5Kanngicsscr HE, Kniestedt C, Robert.YC.Dynamic contour tonometry: presenting a new tonometcr.J Glaucoma, 2005 ; 14 : 344 -350.
  • 6Goldmann H, Schmidt T.Der Rigidita"tskoeffizient (Friedenwald). Ophthalmologica, 1957 ; 133:330-336.
  • 7Bron AM, Creuzot-Garcher C, Goudeau-Boutillon S, d'Athis P. Falsely elevated intraocular pressure due to increased central corneal thickness.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 1999 ; 237 : 220-224.
  • 8Brandt JD, Beiser JA, Kass MA, Gordon MO.Central corneal thickness in the Ocular Hypertension Treatment Study (OHTS).Ophthalmology ,2001 ; 108: 1779-1788.
  • 9Pache M,Sonja Wilmsmeyer, Sonja Lautebach,Jens Funk.Dynamic contour tonometry versus Goldmann applanation tonometry: a comparative study.Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmoll, 2005; 243:763-767.
  • 10Feltgen N, Leifert D, Funk J.Correlation between central corneal thickness, applanation tonometry, and direct intracameral IOP readings.Br J Ophthalmol, 2001 ; 85 : 85-87.

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部