期刊文献+

家族企业委托代理关系研究-山西票号与中世纪意大利家族企业的分析与比较 被引量:5

Research on Principal-Agent Relationship in Family Firms:A Comparative Study of the Shanxi Banks and Medieval Italian Family Firms
下载PDF
导出
摘要 家族企业委托代理问题越来越成为阻碍企业发展的因素。山西票号所有权与经营权的彻底分离给了代理人足够的信任和决策空间,以身股平等参与分红为特征的激励机制和以集体主义惩戒为特征的约束机制,既有效地激励了代理人,又以较小的成本约束了代理人。通过选取在治理结构与委托代理制度上与山西票号存在较大相似性的中世纪意大利家族企业进行比较,可以看出两者在委托代理制度上的一些特点,以及在激励约束机制上的具体做法和制度进步。 The principal-agent problem in family firms has become a huddle for the development of family finns. This study analyzes the principal-agent relationship and the incentive and constraint mechanisms of the Shanxi banks (Shanxi Piaohao). Through the analysis, we find that the separation of management and ownership in the Shanxi banks allows the agents to have sufficient trust and room for decision making which helps bring their management capability into full play. Meanwhile, the incentive mechanism featuring the labor stocks and the disciplinary mechanism characterized by collective punishment provides both the effective incentives to and the constraints on the agents with relatively lower costs. This paper then compares the Shanxi banks with some medieval Italian family firms which are similar in governance structure and principal-agent relationship. Our comparison reveals the characteristics of the principal-agent relationship in the family firms and identifies some specific practices and institutional improvements in incentive and constraint mechanisms.
出处 《山东大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期37-46,共10页 Journal of Shandong University(Philosophy and Social Sciences)
关键词 委托代理 激励约束 身股 集体主义惩戒 principal-agent incentive and constraint mechanism labor stock collective punishment
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1P. Sharma, "An overview of the field of family business studies: Current status and directions for the future," Family Business review, No. 1 (2004), pp. 1-36.
  • 2陈凌.信息特征、交易成本和家族式组织[J].经济研究,1998,33(7):27-33. 被引量:166
  • 3中国人民银行山西分行,山西财经学院,黄鉴辉.《山西票号史料》(增订本),太原:山西经济出版社,2002年.
  • 4梁四宝.试析早期晋商资本运营中的制度创新[J].生产力研究,2000(5):32-33. 被引量:6
  • 5《山西票商盛衰之调查》[J].中外经济周刊,1925,(7).
  • 6君实.记山西票号.东方杂志,1917,(6).
  • 7梁洪学.经理人激励制度的多维解读——对“山西票号”的一个历史判断[J].江汉论坛,2006(6):81-84. 被引量:2
  • 8张正明.《晋商兴衰史》,太原:山西古籍出版社,2001年,第173页.
  • 9Greif, "The Study of Organization and Evolving Organizational Forms Through History: Reflections from the Late Medieval Family Firm," Industry and Corporate Change, Vol. 5, No. 2 ( 1996), pp. 473-501.
  • 10E. Hunt, The medieval Super - Company, Cambridge : Cambridge University Press, 1994, p. 88 - 18 I.

二级参考文献5

共引文献176

同被引文献91

二级引证文献10

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部