期刊文献+

两种ELISA法与免疫酶法检测EB病毒的比较分析 被引量:2

Evaluate the Two ELISA Methods and the EIA Method in Detecting Epstenin-Barr virus
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:比较分析两种ELISA法与免疫酶法(IE法)检测VCA-IgA,并作方法学评价。方法:两种ELISA法和免疫酶法检测36例鼻咽癌(NPC)病人及58例正常人的VCA-IgA。结果:欧蒙(EBV-ELISA)的灵敏度为97.22%、特异性为84.48%、诊断效率为89.36%,国产(EBVELISA)的灵敏度为38 89%、特异性为100%、诊断效率为76.60%,IE法灵敏度为100%、特异性为74.14%、诊断效率为84.04%。结论:好的ELISA法较优于IE法,可作为筛查和早期临床诊断NPC的首选方法。 Objective:To evaluate the two ELISA methods and the EIA method in detecting Epstein-Barr Virus.Methods:The seara of EVB-VCA-IgA in 36 Nasopharyngeal patients and 58 healthy adults were detected Using two ELISA methods and EIA method.Results:For the ELISA method of EUROIMMUN,the sensitivity is 97.22%,the specificity is 74.44%,the percent of detection is 89.36%,For the ELISA method of Interior the sensitivity is 38.89%,the specificity is 100%,the percent of detection is 76.60%,For the EIA menthod,the sensitivity is 100%,the specificity is 74.14%,the percent of detection is 84.04% respectively.Conclusions:In scrcening of Nasopharyngeal and clinical diagnose Nasopharyngeal of early,the better ELISA menthod may use for the first one.
出处 《中国医药导刊》 2009年第11期1918-1919,共2页 Chinese Journal of Medicinal Guide
关键词 酶联免疫法 EB病毒 EB病毒衣壳抗原 IGA抗体 鼻咽癌 ELISA Epstein-Barr Virus VCA-IgA Nasopharynge
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献8

共引文献45

同被引文献31

  • 1周涛,邓永高.EB病毒三项血清学联合检测与鼻咽癌诊断的相关性探讨[J].中华临床医师杂志(电子版),2011,5(11):3308-3309. 被引量:4
  • 2Ascherio A, Munger KL. Epstein-barr virus infection and multiple sclerosis: a review [J]. J Neuroimmune Pharmacol, 2010,5 (3) : 271-277.
  • 3Yajima M, Imadome K, Nakagawa A, et al. A new humanized mouse model of Epstein-Barr virus infection that reproduces per- sistent infection, lymphoproliferative disorder, and cell-mediated and humoral immune responses[J]. J Infect Dis, 2008, 198 (5) : 673-682.
  • 4Yajima M, Imadome K, Nakagawa A, et al. T cell-mediated control of Epstein-Barr virus infection in humanized mice[J]. J Infect Dis, 2009,200(10):1611-1615.
  • 5Gotoh K, Ito Y, Maruo S, et al. Replication of Epstein-Barr virus primary infection in human tonsil tissue explants[J]. PLos One, 2011,6 (10), e25490.
  • 6Altuglu I,Aksoy A,Zeytino? lu A,et al. Evaluation of immunob- lot-based assay for detecting Epstein-Barr virus viral capsid anti- bodies[J]. Mikrobiyol Bul,2010,44(2) :231-236.
  • 7Koidl C, Riedl R, Schweighofer B, et al. Performance of new en- zyme-linked fluorescent assays for detection of Epstein-Barr virus specific antibodies in routine diagnostics[J]. Wien Klin Wochens- chr,2011,123(7-8) : 230-234.
  • 8de Ory F, Guisasola ME, Sanz JC, et al. Evaluation of four com- mercial systems for the diagnosis of Epstein-Barr virus primary in- fections[J]. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 20! 1,18(3) : 444-448.
  • 9Fachiroh J, Paramita DK, Hariwiyanto B, et al. Single-assay com- bination of Epstein-Barr Virus (EBV) EBNA1- and viral capsid antigen-p18-derived synthetic peptides for measuring anti-EBV immunoglobulin G(IgG) and IgA antibody levels in sera from na- sopharyngeal carcinoma patients:options for field screening[J]. J Clin Microbiol, 2006,44 (4) : 1459-1467.
  • 10Paramita DK, Fachiroh J, Haryana SM, et al. Two-step Epstein- Barr virus immunoglobulin A enzyme-linked immunosorbent as- say system for serological screening and confirmation of nasopha- ryngeal carcinoma[J]. Clin Vaccine Immunol, 2009,16 (5) :706- 711.

引证文献2

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部