1Ireland AJ, Hosein I, Sherriff M. Enamel loss at bond-up, debond and clean-up following the use of a conventional light-cured composite and a resin-modified glass polyalkenoate cement. Eur J Orthod,2005,27:413- 419.
2Eminkahyagil N, Arman A, Cetinsahin A, et al. Effect of resin-removal methods on enamel and shear bond strength of rebonded brackets. Angle Orthod, 2006,76 : 314 -321.
3Eliades T, Gioka C, Eliades G, et al. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods. Eur J Orthod ,2004,26:333- 338.
4David VA, Staley RN, Bigelow HF, et al. Remnant amount and cleanup for three adhesives after debracketing. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2002,121:291-296.
5Kim SS, Park WK, Son WS, et al. Enamel surface evaluation after removal of orthodontic composite remnants by intraoral sandblasting: a 3-dimensional surface profilometry study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2007, 132:71-76.
6Tufekci E, Merrill TE, Pintado MR, et al. Enamel loss associated with orthodontic adhesive removal on teeth with whitespot lesion:An in vitro study. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,2004,125:733-739.
7Hosein I, Sherriff M, Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding, debonding, and cleanup with use of a self-etching primer. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004,126 : 717 -724.
8Alexander R, Xie J, Fried D. Selective removal of residual composite from dental enamel surfaces using the third harmonic of a Q-switched Nd : YAG laser. Lasers Surg Med ,2002,30:240-245.
9Dumore T, Fried D. Selective ablation of orthodontic composite by using sub-microsecond IR laser pulses with optical feedback. Lasers Surg Med, 2000,27 : 103-110.
10Thomas BW, Hook CR, Draughn RA. Laser-aided degradation of co mposite resin. Angel Orthod, 1996,66:281-286.
3Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean-up techniques[J]. Am J Orthod, 1980,77 (3) :269 -283
4Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE. Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques, enamelloss and time requirements[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop,1993,103(3) :258 -266
5Krell KV,Jordan RD, Denehy GE. SEM analysis of ultrasonically debonded acid - etch metal retainers in teeth [J]. AM J Dent,1988,1 (2) :67 -70
6Relief DH, Denys FR. Finishing of enamel surfaces after debonding of orthodontic attachments[J]. Angle Orthod, 1979,49(1): 1-10
7Campbell PM.Enamel surfaces after orthodontic bracket debonding[J].Augle Orthod,1995,65(2):103-110
8Krell KV, Courey JM, Bishara SE . Orthodontic bracket removal using conventional and ultrasonic debonding techniques , enamel loss and time requirements. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 1993,103 (3) :258
9袁易全主编.近代超声原理与应用.南京:南京大学出版社,1996.94
10Pus MD, Way DC. Enamel loss due to orthodontic bonding with filled and unfilled resins using various clean - up techniques. Am J Orthod, 1980,77(3) :269
7Tavares SW, Consani S, Nouer DF, et al. Shear bond strength of new and recycled brackets to enamel[J]. Braz Dent J, 2006,17 (1):44- 48.
8Chung CH, Friedman SD, Mante FK. Shear bond strength of re- bonded mechanically retentive ceramic brackets [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofaeial Orthop, 2002, 122 (3) : 282-287.
9Eliades T, Gioka C. Enamel surface roughness following debonding using two resin grinding methods[J]. Eur J Orthod, 2004, 26 (3): 333-338.
10Hosein I, Sherriff M,Ireland AJ. Enamel loss during bonding,deb0nding, and.cleanupwith use of a self-etching primer [J]. Am J 0rthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2004, 126: 717-724.
