期刊文献+

中韩两国老人选择居住方式的比较研究 被引量:5

The Differences of Living Style Between Chinese and Korean Elders
下载PDF
导出
摘要 利用2006年对中国城市烟台的老人和1997年对韩国大中小城市老人调查的数据,对中韩两国城市老人选择居住方式进行了分析。结果表明:在韩国,老人与已婚子女同住的比率很高,而在烟台,老人与子女同住的比率却很低;中韩两国老人与子女分住的主要理由基本相同,而同住的理由则根本不同。韩国老人选择"同住是理所当然或家庭的风俗习惯"的比例最高,而烟台老人选择"同住是为了经济上、生活上帮助子女"的比例最高。通过分析,得出以下结论:韩国城市的大多数老人仍以传统的方式来选择居住安排,另外很多韩国老人之所以与已婚子女同住是因为经济上不能自立,而烟台城市的大多数老人从生活实际情况出发选择居住安排,许多老人之所以选择分住是因为大多数老人经济上能够自立、观念上不支持传统的养老方式。 This paper, based on an investigation of the elders in 2006 in Yantai, China, and the Korean elders in1997, compared and analyzed their different living style. The results show more elders in Korea chose to live with their children than Chinese elders did in Yantai~ the reasons for the elders in both countries to chose to live separately are the same, but the reason for them to choose to live together are different. This paper concluded that most elders in Korea chose to live with their children traditionally, and others chose to do so because they were not economically independent. Most elders in Yantai chose their living style according to their living reality. Many of them chose to live separately because they were economically independent, and did not accept the traditional living style for the elders.
出处 《西北师大学报(社会科学版)》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第6期71-79,共9页 Journal of Northwest Normal University(Social Sciences)
关键词 中韩老人 居住方式 同住 分住 the elders of China and Korea living style influential factors living together living and seperately
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1徐丙淑.老年研究[M].首尔:教文社,1991.
  • 2李佳玉等.老年生活实况分析与政策课题[M].韩国社会保险研究会,1994.
  • 3田渕六郎·中里秀樹.老親扶養と成人子との居住関係[A].渡边秀樹等編.現代家族の構造と変容[M].東京大学出版会,2004.
  • 4刘成镐.影响老人与成年子女分住的主要因素.韩国老年学,1996,16(1).
  • 5刘成镐.影响在美韩国老人与子女分住的主要原因.韩国老年学,1993,13(2).
  • 6杜鹏.中国老年人居住方式变化的队列分析[J].中国人口科学,1999(3):53-58. 被引量:51
  • 7杜鹏.北京市老年人居住方式的变化[J].中国人口科学,1998(2):36-41. 被引量:34
  • 8约翰.罗根,边馥芹.城市老年人口与已婚子女同住的观念与现实[J].中国人口科学,2003(2):46-52. 被引量:19
  • 9鄢盛明 陈皆明 杨善华.《居住安排对子女赡养行为的影响》[J].中国社会科学,2001,(1).
  • 10森罔清美,望月崇共著.日本:新しぃ家族社会学[M].培风馆,1999.

二级参考文献18

  • 1杜鹏.北京市老年人居住方式的变化[J].中国人口科学,1998(2):36-41. 被引量:34
  • 2[8]Bian, Fuqin, John R. Logan, Yanjie Bian (1998), Intergenerational Relations in Urban China: Proximity, Contact and Help to Parents. Demography 35: 115-124.
  • 3[9]Chen, Xiangming (1985), The One-Child Population Policy, Modernization, Extended Chinese Family. Journal of Marriage and the Family 47: 193-202.
  • 4[10]Davis-Friedmann, Deborah (1991), Long Lives: Chinese Elderly and the Communist Revolution (Second Edi tion). Harvard University Press.
  • 5[11]Goode, William J. (1970), World Revolution and Family Patterns. Free Press.
  • 6[12]Lee, Yean-ju, William L. Parish, Robert J. Willis(1994), Sons, Daughters, and Intergenerational Support in Taiwan. American Journal of Sociology 99: 1010-1041.
  • 7[13]Logan, John R. , Fuqin Bian, Yanjie Bian(1998), Tradition and Change in the Urban Chinese Family: The Case of Living Arrangements. Social Forces 76:851 - 882.
  • 8[14]Martin, Linda G. (1988), The Aging of Asia. Journal of Gerontology: Social Sciences 43: S99-113.
  • 9[15]Milagros, Maruja B. Asis, Domingo Lita, John Knodel, and Kalyani Mehta(1995), Living Arrangements in Four Asian Countries : A Comparative Perspective. Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology 10: 145- 162.
  • 10[16]Morgan, S. Philip and Kiyosi Hirosima(1983), The Persistence of Extended Family Residence in Japan: Anachronism or Alternative Strategy? American Sociological Review 48: 269-281.

共引文献101

同被引文献49

引证文献5

二级引证文献24

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部