期刊文献+

微侵入经皮钢板植入技术结合锁定加压钢板与普通钢板治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折的临床评价 被引量:12

Clinical evaluation of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis with locking compressive plate and conventional plate for fixation of distal tibial comminuted fractures
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的应用微侵入经皮钢板植入技术(MIPPO)植入锁定加压钢板(LCP)与常规切口普通钢板治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折,评价并比较两种方法的临床效果。方法105例胫骨远端粉碎性骨折患者随机分为MIPPO组(53例)和常规组(52例),MIPPO组置入LCP,常规组置入普通钢板,对两种术式的切口长度、出血量、手术时间、住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术后功能等指标进行比较。结果91例获11~38(23.5±9.58)个月随访。MIPPO组较常规组切口小[MIPPO组为(5.2±1.35)cm,常规组为(11.3±2.69)cm,P<0.05],出血量少[MIPPO组为(122±45.8)ml,常规组为(260±40.3)ml,P<0.05],手术时间短[MIPPO组(45.3±18.5)min,常规组(67.3±22.3)min,P<0.05]。常规组1例出现骨不连并再次手术,余患者骨折均愈合良好。两组间平均住院时间、骨折愈合时间、术后功能评价比较差异均无统计学意义。结论MIPPO技术结合LCP与普通钢板均为较好治疗胫骨远端粉碎性骨折的方法,应用MIPPO技术结合LCP更具有优势,可减少手术损伤,间接提高治疗成功率,有利于患者肢体功能的恢复。 Objective To investigate the clinical effect of minimally invasive percutaneous plate osteosynthesis(MIPPO) with locking compressive plate(LCP) and conventional plate for fixation of distal tibial comminuted fractures.Methods MIPPO technique was applied in 53 out of 105 cases,classic technique for fixation was applied in the other cases.Length of the incision,blood loss,operating time,hospital stay,fracture healing time and postoperative function were compared.Results 91 patients were followed up for 11~38 months(mean 23.5±9.58 months),one cases sustained bone nonunion and got revision and the others had successful got bone union with mean time 3.1 months of MIPPO group and 3.4 months of classic incision group.The length of incision was(5.2±1.35)cm in MIPPO group and(11.3±2.69)cm in conventional group;blood loss was(122±45.8)ml in MIPPO group and(260±40.3)ml in conventional group;operation time was(45.3±18.5)min in MIPPO group and(67.3±22.3)min in conventional group.The differences were significant(P〈0.05).Mean original hospistal stay,bone union time and fuctional results were not significant different.Conclusions Application of minimally invasive percutuneous plate osteosynthesis with LCP as a superior option compared with conventional plate will be a better choice for fixation of distal tibial comminuted fractures.
出处 《临床骨科杂志》 2009年第5期524-526,共3页 Journal of Clinical Orthopaedics
关键词 胫骨骨折 骨折固定术 外科手术 微创性 锁定加压钢板 tibial fractures fracture fixation internal surgical procedure minimally invasive locking compressive plate
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献14

  • 1王刚,卜海富,谢武昆.胫腓骨远端粉碎性骨折的治疗[J].临床骨科杂志,2004,7(2):156-158. 被引量:16
  • 2龚伟华,孙月华,朱振安,史定伟,唐坚.分期微创治疗胫腓骨开放性骨折[J].临床骨科杂志,2005,8(1):10-13. 被引量:22
  • 3Johner R, Wruhs O. Classification of tibial shaft fractures and correlation with results after rigid internal fixation[ J]. Clin Orthop,1983,(178) :7 ~25.
  • 4Schutz M,Sudkamp N,Frigg R. Pinless external fixation:indication and preliminary results in tibial shaft fractures[ J]. Clin Orthop, 1998, (347) :35 ~ 42.
  • 5Marsh JL, Bonar S, Nepola JV. Used of an articulated external fixator for fractures of the tibial plafond [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1995,77 (10): 1498 ~ 509.
  • 6Alberts KA, Loohagen G, Einarsdottir H. Open tital fractures: faster union after unreamed nailing than external fixation[J]. Injury,1999,30(8) :519 ~23.
  • 7Oh CW, Kyung HS, Park IH. Distal tibia metaphyseal fractures treated by percutaneous plate osteosynthesis [ J ]. Clin Orthop,2003, (408) :286 ~ 91.
  • 8Khoury A, Liebergall M, London E. Percutaneous plating of distal tibial fractures [ J ]. Foot Ankle Int, 2002,23 ( 9 ) :818 ~ 24.
  • 9Collinge CA, Sanders RW. Percutaneous plating in the lower extremity[J]. J Am Acad Orthop Surg,2000,8(4) :211 ~6.
  • 10Farouk O, Krettek C, Miclau T. Minimally invasive plate osteosynthesis: does percutaneous plating disrupt femoral blood supply less than the traditional technique? [J]. J Orthop Trauma, 1999,13(6) :401 ~6.

共引文献30

同被引文献119

引证文献12

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部