期刊文献+

孕产期健康教育与产褥期妇女生命质量调查 被引量:6

Investigation on prenatal health education and quality of life of puerperal women
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:探讨产褥期妇女生命质量状况。方法:应用MOSSF-36健康调查量表和自制母婴保健知识调查问卷对555例产后42天回医院检查的产妇进行问卷调查。结果:产褥期妇女生命质量整体状况较好,社会功能、生理机能、精神健康、躯体疼痛4个维度水平较高,生理职能、情感职能2个维度水平较低。接受健康教育不同,产褥期妇女生命质量有所不同,系统健康教育组与非系统健康教育组比较在社会功能和精神健康2个维度得分低,差异具有统计学意义(P<0.01、P<0.05)。非系统健康教育组产妇阴道炎、子宫颈糜烂的发生率较高。结论:产前接受健康教育程度、产褥期母婴保健知识和护理能力会影响产褥期妇女的生命质量。 Objective: To explore the quality of life of puerperal women. Methods: 555 women were surveyed by MOS SF - 36 health questionnaire and self - designed questionnaire of maternal and infant care on the 42nd day after delivery. Results: The general quality of life of puerperal women was good, the dimension levels of social function, physiological function, mental health and somatic pain were high, the dimension levels of role - physical and role - emotional were low. The quality of life of puerperal women depended on their levels of accepting health education, the dimension levels of social function and mental health in standardized education group were lower than those in non - standardized education group ( P 〈 0. 01, P 〈0. 05 ) . The incidences of vaginitis and cervical erosion in non - standardized education group were higher than those in standardized education group. Conclusion: The effect factors of quality of life of puerperal women include level of accepting health education, maternal and infant care knowledge and nursing competency in puerperium.
出处 《中国妇幼保健》 CAS 北大核心 2009年第33期4704-4706,共3页 Maternal and Child Health Care of China
基金 广东省佛山市卫生局科研立项〔2006107〕
关键词 产褥期妇女 健康教育 SF-36健康调查量表 生命质量 Puerperal women Health education SF - 36 health questionnaire Quality of life
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献21

  • 1Ware JE Jr, Snow KK, Kosinski M, et al.SF-36 health survey manual and interpretation guide.Boston: New England Medical Center the Health Institute,1993.1-12.
  • 2Perneger TV, Leplege A, Etter JF,et al.Validation of a French-language version of the MOS 36-Item Short Form Health Survey(SF-36) in young healthy adults.J Clin Epidemiol, 1995,48:1051-1060.
  • 3Guillemin F, Bombardier C, Beaton D.Cross-cultural adaptation of health-related quality of life measures: literature review and proposed guidelines.J Clin Epidemiol, 1993,46:1417-1432.
  • 4Gandek B, Ware JE Jr.Methods for validating and norming translations of health status questionnaires: the IQOLA Project approach.International Quality of Life Assessment.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:953-959.
  • 5顾杏元,金丕焕.直线回归与相关.见: 金丕焕,主编.医用统计方法.上海:上海医科大学出版社,1993.115-119.
  • 6Lam CL, Gandek B, Ren XS, et al.Tests of scaling assumptions and construct validity of the Chinese(HK) version of the SF-36 Health Survey.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1139-1147.
  • 7Ren XS, Amick B 3rd, Zhou L, et al.Translation and psychometric evaluation of a Chinese version of the SF-36 Health Survey in the United States.J Clin Epidemiol, 1998,51:1129-1138.
  • 8Till JE, Osoba D, Pater JL, et al.Research on health-related quality of life: dissemination into practical applications.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:279-283.
  • 9Mathias SD, Fifer SK, Patrick DL.Rapid translation of quality of life measures for international clinical trials: avoiding errors in the minimalist approach.Qual Life Res, 1994,3:403-412.
  • 10Armor DJ.Theta reliability and factor scaling.In: Costner HL, ed.Sociological Methodology:1973-74.San Francisco, CA:Jossey-Bass,1974.17-50.

共引文献2164

同被引文献34

引证文献6

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部