期刊文献+

安氏Ⅱ~1类错与正常牙弓宽度的研究 被引量:4

Compared study of dental arch width between Angle class Ⅱ division 1 and normal occlusion
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的:以正常为对照,研究安氏Ⅱ1类错牙弓宽度的特点。方法:选择12~16岁的安氏Ⅱ1类错和正常各60例,取标准研究模型,利用3DSS(光栅扫描仪)扫描后,以Geomajic软件进行图像拟合处理,并测量上下颌牙弓前、中、后段长度,分析安氏Ⅱ1类错与正常牙弓宽度的差异。结果:①.正常男性上下颌牙弓宽度均比女性大,其中上颌牙弓及下颌后段牙弓宽度有显著性差异(P<0.05)。②.安氏II1类错男性上下颌牙弓宽度均大于女性,其中上颌牙弓后段及下颌牙弓前段、后段宽度有显著性差异(P<0.05)。③.安氏II1类错无论男女,上颌牙弓后段宽度明显小于正常,有显著性差异(P>0.05)。结论:安氏II1类错患者上颌牙弓小于正常牙弓,治疗时应扩展上颌后段牙弓使腭侧倾斜的后牙颊倾,或用牙弓与基骨联合扩展的方法加大上颌后段牙弓宽度,利于下牙弓前移,建立正常的磨牙关系。 Objective: Compard with normal occlusion, to analyze the characteristic of arch width of patients who fall into Angle class Ⅱ, division 1 malocclusion.Method: 60 patients with Angle class Ⅱ division Ⅰ malocclusion and 60 persons with normal occlusion were selected, both of which were 12-16 years old,study models were made. After the study models being scanned by 3DSS,they were treated by image fitting with Geomajic software. The width of anterior, middle,posterior segment of the upper and lower dental arch was measured, thus the difference of arch width between Angle class Ⅱ divisionl and normal occlusion was analyzed. Result: ①.Boys with normal occlusion had statistically significant wider dental arch width values on the upper posterior dentition and the lower anterior dentition than girls' counterparts. ②.In addition, boys with Ⅱ 1 malocclusion also had statistically significant wider lower posterior dental arch width than girls' counterparts. ③. The palatal upper posterior dental width values on the normal occlusion were statistically significantly larger than those on the Ⅱ 1 malocclusion for both sexes. Conclusion: The dental arch in class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion should be expanded to accommodate the forward moving mandibular dental arch.
出处 《临床口腔医学杂志》 2009年第11期677-679,共3页 Journal of Clinical Stomatology
关键词 安氏Ⅱ类1分类错[牙合] 正常[牙合] 牙弓宽度 Angle class Ⅱdivision 1 normal occlusion dental arch width
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1Staley RN,Stuntz WR, Petersson LC. A comparison of arch width in aduhs with normal occlusian and aduhs with Class II divisio 1 malocclusion [K].Am J Orthod, 1985,88 (20): 163-169.
  • 2Sayin MO,Turkkahraman H. Comparison of dental arch and alveolar widths of patients with Class Ⅱ division 1 malocclusion and subjects with Class I ideal occlusion[J]. Angle Orthod, 2004, 74: 356-360.
  • 3聂琼,林久祥.Angle Ⅱ~1与正常牙弓形态差异——应用欧几里德距离矩阵分析法[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2005,21(5):659-662. 被引量:6
  • 4Uysal T, Memili B, Usumez S, et al. Dental and alveolar arch widths in normal occlusion, Class Ⅱ division 1 and Class Ⅱ division 2 [J]. Angle Orthod, 2005, 75: 941-947.
  • 5Samir E Bishara, Paymun Bayati,Jane RJakobsen. Longitudinal comparians of dental arch changes in normal and untreated Class Ⅱ, Division I subjects and their clinical implications [J]. Am J Orthod Dentofac Orthop, 1996, 110: 483-489.
  • 6Roberto M A, Lima Filho, Anna Leticia Lima. Long-term outcome of skeletal Class Ⅱ Division 1 malocclusion treated with rapid palatal expansion and Kloehn cervical headgear[J]. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop, 2003, 124: 216-241.

二级参考文献15

  • 1张伶军,段银钟,惠光艳.西安地区乳前牙反■牙弓形态特征的研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,1996,12(4):278-280. 被引量:4
  • 2Lele S,Richtsmeier J. On comparing biological shapes:Detection of influenciallandmarks. Am J Phys Anthropol,1992, 87(1): 49
  • 3Hens SM. Growth and sexual dimorphism in orangutan crania:A three-dimensional approach.Am J Phys Anthropol, 2003, 121(1):19
  • 4Ayoub AF, Millect DT,Hasan S. Evaluation of skeletal stability following surgicalcorrection of mandibular prognathism. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 2000,38(4):305
  • 5Singh GD, Hodge MR. Bimaxillary morphometry of patients with Angle II division 1malocclusion treated with Twin Block appliances. Angle Orthod, 2002,72(5):402
  • 6Bell A, Ayoub AF. Assessment of the accuracy of a three-dimensional imaging system forarchiving dental study models. J Orthod, 2003,30(3):219
  • 7Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Miani A Jr,et al. Dental arch asymmetry in young human subjectsevaluated by Euclidean distance matrix analysis. Arch Oral Biol,1993,38(3):189
  • 8Ferrario VF, Sfornza C, Miani A Jr,et al. Maxillary versus mandibular arch formdifferences in human permanent dentition assessed by Euclidean-distance matrixanalysis.Arch Oral Biol,1994,39(2):135
  • 9Ferrario VF, Sfroza C, Miani A Jr,et al. Human dental arch shape evaluated byEuclidean-distance matrix analysis. Am J Phys Anthropol,1993,90(4):445
  • 10Buschang PH, Stroud J, Alexander RG. Differences in dental arch morphology among adultfemales with untreated Angle I and Angle II malocclusion. Eur J Orthod,1994,16(1):47

共引文献5

同被引文献43

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部