期刊文献+

不同内固定方法治疗Mason Ⅱ型桡骨头骨折临床效果的对比研究 被引量:10

Comparative study on the clinical results of treatment of Mason type-Ⅱ radial head fracture by different internal fixation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 [目的]比较研究Herbert钉、微型空心松质骨螺钉、微型皮质骨螺钉以及克氏针内固定治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折的临床效果。[方法]1999年1月-2005年7月共收治34例MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折,7例行Herbert钉内固定术(1组),10例行微型空心松质骨螺钉内固定术(2组),9例行微型皮质骨螺钉内固定术(3组),8例行克氏针内固定术(4组)。通过随访对4组患者肘关节的疼痛、功能评分以及运动、肌力、X线表现进行比较研究。[结果]术后随访2~6年,平均4.5年,4组平均肘关节痛觉满意视觉模拟评分(VAS评分)分别为24.2、23.7、21.5和19.7分(P<0.01),平均Broderg和Morrey肘关节功能评分分别为93.3、94.1、91.4和86.3分(P<0.01);4组患者肘关节伸、屈以及前臂旋前活动度差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),但伸肘、屈肘肌力以及旋前和旋后肌力差异无显著性(P>0.01),均正常。[结论]与克氏针内固定相比,切开复位Herbert钉、微型空心松质骨螺钉以及微型皮质骨螺钉内固定治疗MasonⅡ型桡骨头骨折可获得较满意的关节活动范围以及较好的关节功能恢复。 [ Objective ] To compare the clinical results of treatment of Mason type- Ⅱ radial head fracture by open reduction and internal fixation with Herbert screw, micro-cannulated screw, micro-cartical screw and Kirschner wire. [ Method ] Thirty-four cases of Mason type- Ⅱ radial head fracture were treated from Jan. 1999 to July 2005. Seven cases had internally fixed with Herbert screws ( group 1 ) , 10 with micro-cannulated screws ( group 2 ) , 9 with micro-cartical screws ( group 3 ) , and 8 with Kirschner wires ( group 4). The outcomes were assessed with regard to the pain, elbow functional rating score and motion, strength, radio- graphic findings. [ Result ] The mean follow-up was 4.5 (2-6) years. The averaged pain VAS score was 24.2,23.7,21.5 and 19. 7, respectively, with a P value of 0.0046. And the mean Broberg and Morrey functional rating score was 93.3,94.1,91.4 and 86. 3 ( P = 0. 0069). The elbow extension, flexion and the forearm anterior rotation range differed statistically among the 4 groups ( P 〈0.01 ) ,but the strength of elbow extension ,flexion and forearm rotation showed no statistical difference among the 4 groups( P 〉 0.01 ). [ Conclusion] Compared to internal fixation with wires,open reduction and internal fixation with Herbert screws, micro- cannulated screws and micro-cartical screws can result in more satisfying elbow motion and better functional recovery in treating Mason type-Ⅱ radial head fracture.
出处 《中国矫形外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2009年第22期1700-1703,共4页 Orthopedic Journal of China
关键词 桡骨 骨折 内固定 radius fracture internal fixation
  • 相关文献

参考文献3

二级参考文献21

  • 1梅汉尧,索鹏,周永顶,高凌光,王浩杰.MasonⅡ、Ⅲ型桡骨头骨折不同手术方法的比较[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2006,14(14):1051-1054. 被引量:35
  • 2Broberg MA.Morley BF.Results of delayed excision of the radial head after fracture.J Bone Joint Stag(Am)1986,68:669-674.
  • 3Herbertsson P,Josefsson PO,HasseriusR,et al,Uncomplicated mason type-Ⅱand Ⅲ fractures of the radial head and neck in adults:a long-team follow-up study.J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2004,86:569—574.
  • 4Mason ML.Some observations on fractures of the head of the radius with a review of one hundred cases.Br J Surg,1954,42:123-32.
  • 5Thompson JD.Comparison of flexion versus extension splinting in the treatment of Mason bype Ⅰ radial head and fractures.J Orthop Trauma,1988,2:117-119.
  • 6Boulas HJ, Morrey BF. Biomechanical evaluation of the elbow following radial head fracture. Comparison of open reduction and internal fixation vs.excision,silastic replacement, and non-operative management. Chir main,1998,17: 314-320.
  • 7Ring D, Quintero J, Jupiter JR. Open reduction and internal fixation of the fractures of the radial head . J Bone Joint Surg(Am),2002,84:1811-1815.
  • 8Parasa RB, Maffulli N. Surgical managenlent of radial head fractures [J]. J R Coil Surg Edinb, 2001,46:76 -85.
  • 9Harrington IJ, Sekyi-Otu A, Barrington TW, et al. The junctional outcome with metallic radial head implants in the treatment of unstable elbow fractures: a long term review[ J]. J Trauma, 2001,50:46-52.
  • 10Caputo AE, Mazzocca AD, Santoro VM. The nonarticulating portion of the radial head : anatomic and clinical correlations for internal fixation [ J ]. J Hand Surg( Am), 1998,23 ( 6 ) : 1082-1090.

共引文献51

同被引文献95

引证文献10

二级引证文献26

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部