3Garrett S, Jenkinson T, Kennedy LG, et al. A new approach to defining disease status in ankylosing spondylitis: the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Disease Activity Index [ J ]. J Rheumato 1, 1994, 21: 2286.
4Mander M, Simpson JM, McLellan A, et al. Studies with an enthesis index as a method of elinieal assessment in ankylosing spondylitls[J]. Ann Rheum Dis, 1987, 46: 197.
5Scott DL, van Riel PL, van derHeijde D, et al. Assessing disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis [ M]. In: The EULAR handbook of standard methods. 2nd ed. Uppsala: Pharmaeia Graphic Communications, 1995 : 204.
6Calin A, Garrett S, Whitelock H, et al. A new approach to defining functional ability in ankylosing spondylitis: the development of the Bath Ankylosing Spondylitis Functional Index [ J ]. J Rheumatol, 1994,21 : 2281.
7Jenkinson TR, Mallorie PA, Whitelock HC, et al. Defining spina lmobility in ankylosing spondylitis. The Bath AS Metrology Index[J]. J Rheumatol, 1994, 21 : 1694.
8Ware JE Jr, Sherbourne CD. The MOS 36 - item short - form health survey (SF- 36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection[J]. Med Care, 1992, 30: 473.
9Anderson JJ, Baron G, vander tteijde D, et al. Ankylosing spondylitis assessment group preliminary definition of short - term improvement in ankylosing spondylitis [ J ]. Arthritis Rheum, 2001, 44: 1876.
10Bostan EE, Borman P, Boclur H, et al. Functional disability and quality of life in patients with ankylosing spondylitis [ J ]. Rheumatol Int, 2003,23: 121.
