5Elman M,Slatkine M,Harth Y.The effective treatment of acne vulgaris by a high-intensity,narriw band 405-420 nm light source.J Cosmet Laser Ther,2003,5:111-117.
2Doshi A, Zaheer A, Stiller MJ. A comparison of current acne grading systems and proposal of a novel system. Int J Dermatol, 1997, 36(6) :416 -418.
3Lehmann HP, Robinson KA, Andrews JS, et al. Acne therapy: a methodologic review. J Am Acad Dermatol, 2002, 47 (2):231 -240.
4Dreno B, Bodokh I, Chivot M, et al. ECLA grading: a system of acne classhqcation for every day dermatological practice. Ann Dermatol Venereol, 1999. 126(2) :136 - 141.
5Allen BS, Smith JG Jr. Various parameters for grading aene vu]garis.Arch Dermatol, 1982, 118( 1 ) :23 -25.
7Lucky AW, Barber BL, Girman CJ, et al. A multiratex validation study to assess the reliability of acne lesion counting. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1996, 35(4) :559 -565.
8Rizova E, Pagnoni PA, Stoudemayer T, et al. Polarized light photography and videomicroscopy greatly enhance the capability of estimating the therapeuic response to a topical retinoid (adapalene) in aene vulgaris. Cutis, 2001,68(4 Suppl) :25 -33.
9Pochi PE, Shalita AR, Strauss JS, et al. Report of the Consensus Conference on Acne Classification. Washington, D C , March 24 and 25, 1990. J Am Acad Dermatol, 1991,24(3) :495 -500.
10Rizer RL, Mills OH Jr, Hino PD, et al. The assessment of acne: reevaluation of grading strategies. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 2000, 67 (2) :96.
