摘要
目的:分析10例宫颈癌调强放疗(IMRT)与箱式四野放疗各危及器官剂量差别和急性毒副反应,评价IMRT做为宫颈癌常规放疗的可行性。方法:选择2006年1月至2007年3月我科收治的10例宫颈癌根治性放疗患者,每位患者均同时作调强计划和箱氏四野计划,比较各危及器官的DVH曲线图。结果:两种方法处方剂量均较好的覆盖了靶区。在50Gy水平,IMRT中小肠、膀胱、直肠的体积分别减少了24.1%、38.1%、28.5%,患者副反应轻微,治疗过程中患者耐受性好。结论:IMRT在宫颈癌治疗中剂量分布优于箱式四野放疗。
Objective :To analysis the impact difference between the IMRE and box fieldwork between organ dose and acute toxic reaction of 10 cases of cervical cancer. Methods :Ten cervical cancer patients treated with radical radiotherapy were selected and do the planning of IMRT and box fieldwork for each of patient , the compare DVH cure to oberve the endanger organ. Results: The prescrption does of the two methods showed good coverage of target at 50 Gy,for IMRT,the volume of small intestine ,bladder,rectal decreased by 24.1% ,38.1% ,and 28.5%. Patients had less side effects , and well tolerated. Conclusion: IMRT has more advantages than four fields box of types in teletherapy with cervical carcinoma.
出处
《现代肿瘤医学》
CAS
2009年第12期2410-2413,共4页
Journal of Modern Oncology
关键词
宫颈癌
调强放疗
剂量特点
cervical cancer IMRT , dosimetric characteristic