WTO知识产权争端解决实践十三年:回顾与评述被引量：2

An Empirical Research on the WTO IPR Dispute Settlement Practices in the Past Thirteen Years

导出

摘要 WTO成立后,其争端解决机制获得普遍赞扬,也因此掩盖了一些内在问题。对WTO知识产权争端的实证研究表明,至少在本领域,"权力导向"仍在起作用。作为乌拉圭回合产生的新协定,《TRIPS协定》并不完备,在"非违反之诉"的适用、WTO与WIPO的合作与协调等体制性问题上,仍有很大的不确定性。知识产权问题本身的敏感性和复杂性,也彰显了WTO争端解决机制中普遍存在的参与问题。 Universal praises won by the WTO Dispute Settlement Mechanism（DSM） conceal lots of inherent problems. An empirical research shows that ＂power orientation＂ still works at least in IPR cases. As a new agreement created in the Uruguay Round, the TRIPS Agreement isn＇ t perfect. Systematic issues, such as the applicability of non-violation actions and the coordination between WTO and WIPO, are legally uncertain. Moreover, the sensitiveness and complexity of IPR issue highlight the issue of participation in the DSM.

作者李晓玲

机构地区北京大学法学院

出处《国际经贸探索》 CSSCI 北大核心 2009年第11期70-75,共6页 International Economics and Trade Research

关键词争端解决机制知识产权非违反之诉 dispute settlement mechanism intellectual property rights （IPR） non-violation action

分类号 D923 [政治法律—民商法学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献9

1IWTO官方网站资料,www.wto.org.
2《TRIPS协定》第1.3条,第2条,第3.1条,及注释2.
3刘丽娟.2002.TRIPS协定争端解决机制研究[M].//郑成思.知识产权文丛.北京:中国方正出版社.
4张建邦.知识产权国际组织内部争端解决机制述评──基于WIPO和WTO的理论和实践[J].国际贸易问题,2007(10):120-127. 被引量：5
5Anne Hiaring. 2006. Fish or Fowl? The Nature of WTO Dispute Resolution under TRIPS [J]. Annual Survey of International & Comparative Law. Vol. 12.
6Frederick M. Abbott. 2000. Distributed Governance at the WTO-WIPO: An Evolving Model for Open-architecture Integrated Governance [J]. Journal of International Economic Law. Vol.3, No.1.
7Jose Felgueroso. 2002. TRIPS and the Dispute Settlement Understanding: the First Six Years [J]. American Intellectual Property Law Quarterly Journal. Vol.30 No.2.
8UNCTAD-ICTSD. 2005. Resource Book on TRIPS and Development[M]. Oxford: Cambridge University Press.
9Zhang Naigen. 2003. Dispute Settlement under the TRIPS Agreement from the Perspective of Treaty Interpretation [J]. Temple International & Comparative Law Journal, Vol.17, No.1.

二级参考文献11

1斯蒂夫·查诺维兹,张若思(译).WTO与个人权利[J].环球法律评论,2002,24(124):340-349. 被引量：15
2冯术杰.试论WTO争端解决机制在TRIPs协议国内实施领域的局限性——对于发展中国家国内知识产权法实施阶段的争端考察[J].环球法律评论,2006,28(3):361-371. 被引量：7
3WIPO ,WIPO Intellectual Property Handbook: Policy, Law and Use (2nd ed.) , WIPO Publication No.489 (E) , P. 261.
4Greece-Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights for Motion Pictures and TV Programs, WT/DS125.
5US-Section 337 of the Tariff Act of 1930, BISD 36S/345 (adopted by the GATr Contracting Parties on Nov. 7 , 1989) .
6US-US Patents Code, WT/DS224.
7Laurence R. Heifer and Graeme B. Dinwoodie, (2001)“Designing Non-National Systems: The Case of The Uniform Domain Name Dispute Resolution Policy,” William and Mary Law Review 43, 141, 160, 185, 192, 213, 217, 243 (2001) .
8The Management of Internet Names and Addresses: Intellectual Property Issues-Final Report of the WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, April 30, 1999, all the text; Chapter 3; paras.170,171.
9Andrew F. Christie, "The ICANN Domain Name Dispute Resolution System as A Model for Resolving Other Intellectual Property Disputes on the Internet," available at http://ssm.com/ abstract_id=319201.
10The Recognition of Rights and the Use of Names in the Intemet Domain Name System-Final Report of the Second WIPO Internet Domain Name Process, Sep. 3, 2001.