面子与消费——基于结构方程模型的实证分析被引量：13

Mianzi and consumption:an empirical study based on SEM

下载PDF

导出

摘要面子是一个非常本土化的概念,国内外学者一致认为面子文化深刻影响了中国人的日常生活和消费行为。在文献和定性访谈的基础上提出面子是一种符号资源,探讨面子与消费之间的关系,通过提出有创新性的概念模型,进一步分析面子观念、消费态度、消费取向、消费目的与消费水平之间的关系。研究结果表明,在市场化程度越来越高的条件下,人们不仅在争夺经济资源、社会资源,也在争夺符号资源。 As a localized concept, ＇mianzi＇/face culture affects Chinese people＇s daily life and consumption behavior deeply. Based on literature study and qualitative research, this paper advances that mianzi/face is a kind of symbolic resource and puts forward a structural equation model. Then the author discusses the relationship between face, consumption attitude, consumption guidance （self-oriented or others-oriented）, consumption purpose and consumption level. Research findings show that pushed by market-driven economy, people are vying for symbol resources as well as economic and social resources.

作者姜彩芬

机构地区广州大学商学院

出处《广州大学学报（社会科学版）》 2009年第10期55-60,共6页 Journal of Guangzhou University:Social Science Edition

关键词面子符号消费 mianzi/face symbol consumption

分类号 F063.2 [经济管理—政治经济学]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献13

1张义彤,董伟.《SPSS统计分析高级教程》,高等教育出版社,2004年,第419页.
2成达建.面子:管理中难以回避的文化差异问题[J].企业活力,2004(8):60-61. 被引量：6
3明恩溥.文明与陋习-典型的中国人[M].舒扬,等,译.太原:书海出版社,2004:3.
4林语堂.中国人[M].上海:学林出版社,1994.
5鲁迅.说面子[M]∥鲁迅全集.北京:人民文学出版社,1981:126.
6胡先缙.中国人的面子观[C]∥黄光国,胡先缙等.面子:中国人的权力游戏.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004:40-62.
7何友晖.面子的动力:从概念化到测量[M]∥中国社会心理学评论:第2辑.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:68.
8王雅刚.布朗与列文森礼貌理论研究述评[J].长沙大学学报,2005,19(1):85-87. 被引量：11
9成中英.脸面观念及其儒学根源[M]∥中国社会心理学评论:第2辑.北京:社会科学文献出版社,2006:35.
10Oliver H M Yau. Consumer Behavior in China:Customer satisfaction and cultural values [ M ]. T. J. Press ( Padstow) Ltd, Padstow Cornwall, 1994:72-77.

二级参考文献20

1Blum- Kulka, Shoshana. 1987. Indirectness and politeness in requests: Same or different[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 11 : 131- 146.
2Blum- Kulka, Shoshana. 1990. You don't touch lettuce with your fingers: Parental politeness in family discomse[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 14: 259- 288.
3Brown, Penelope and Stephen C. Levinson. 1987 [1978]. 2^nd ed. Politeness: Some Universals in Language Usage [ M].Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
4Goffman, Erring. 1967. Interaction Ritual: Essays on Face to Face Behavior [ M]. New York: Garden City.
5Gu, Yueguo. 1990. Politeness phenomenon in modem Chinese[J]. Journal of Pragmatics 14:237 - 257.
6Holtgraves, Thomas. 1992. The hnguistic realization of face management: Implications for language production and comprehension, person perception, and cross - cultural eonmatmieation[J]. Social Psychology Quarterly 55:141 - 159.
7Holtgraves, Thomas and Joong- Nam Yang. 1990. Politeness as universal: Cross- cultural perceptions of request strategies and inferences based on their use [ J ]. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 59:719 - 729.
8Kasper, Gabriele. 1997. Linguistic etiquette [A]. In F.Coulmas (eel.). The Handbook of Sociolinguistics [ C]. Oxford: Blackwell.
9Mao, IalMing R. 1994. Beyond politeness theory:‘Face' revisited and renewed [J]. Journal of Pragmatics 21 : 451 - 486.
10Matsumoto, Yoshiko. 1988. Reexamination of the universality of face: Politeness phenomena in Japanese [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics 12:403 - 426.