期刊文献+

洞庭湖区湿地生态系统健康综合评价 被引量:71

Assessment and analysis of wetland ecosystem health in Dongting Lake
原文传递
导出
摘要 湿地与海洋、森林并称为地球三大生态系统,湿地退化速度远大于其他生态系统,从而使得湿地健康评价与分析成为湿地领域研究的重点内容之一。本文以生态系统健康及压力-状态-响应模型为研究方法,综合利用遥感、野外实测和社会统计等多源数据,建立一套湿地生态系统健康评价指标体系,集成利用遥感和地理信息技术建立湿地生态系统健康评价模型,实施湿地压力、状态、响应、健康分析,揭示了洞庭湖湿地生态系统健康状况的空间分布规律。研究结果表明:(1)洞庭湖区31%的湿地面临人类干扰压力较大,19%的湿地状态较好,82%的湿地生态系统发生很大变化。(2)湿地的总面积在人类活动的干预下逐渐缩小,湿地综合健康较差、一般和较好的区域分别占总面积的6%、75%和19%,缺乏健康状况最好及最差的区域。(3)湘阴县、沅江县及岳阳县的湿地生态系统健康状况较好,益阳县较差,安乡县等12个县市一般。 Wetlands are one of the most important ecosystems on Earth and the major feature of the landscape in almost all parts of the world, which is very important to the sustainable development of anthropogenic society at a regional or global scale. Taking Dongting Lake as a study region, this paper firstly established evaluation indicators of wetland health concerning hydrology, ecology and environment according to the feature of wetlands and principle of PSR (Pressure-State-Response) model. Secondly, multi-temporal remote sensing data were acquired by TM (Thematic Mapper) sensor onboard of American Landsat satellite system, geographical data, land use/cover data, field detection data and social statistic data. Thirdly, special information of each evaluation indicator was extracted from different data sources and analyzed. Finally, a PSR model supported by GIS was used to evaluate and analyze wetland ecosystem health. The results show that the areas with better, generic and worse health conditions account for 19%, 75% and 6% of the total area respectively, and that there are no areas with best and worst health conditions. The wetland ecosystem health condition is better in Xiangyin County, Yuanjiang County and Yueyang County. The health condition of Yiyang County is worse. The other counties belong to the average grade of health.
出处 《地理研究》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第6期1665-1672,共8页 Geographical Research
基金 国家自然科学基金(40701172) 北京市科技计划项目(D08040600580801) 国家科技支撑项目(2008BAC34B01) 河海大学水文水资源与水利工程科学国家重点实验室开放基金
关键词 洞庭湖 湿地 生态系统 健康 评价 Dongting Lake wetland ecosystem health assessment
  • 相关文献

参考文献4

二级参考文献22

  • 1王备新,杨莲芳,胡本进,单林娜.应用底栖动物完整性指数B-IBI评价溪流健康[J].生态学报,2005,25(6):1481-1490. 被引量:194
  • 2张远,徐成斌,马溪平,张铮,王俊臣.辽河流域河流底栖动物完整性评价指标与标准[J].环境科学学报,2007,27(6):919-927. 被引量:148
  • 3美国环境保护局近海监测处.河口环境监测指标[M].北京:海洋出版社,1997.112-143.
  • 4Paul A Keddy. Wetland Ecology Principles and Conservation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,2000. 124~238.
  • 5Holland M M. Wetlands and Environment Gradients. In: Mulamoottil G, Warner B G, McBean E A. Wetland Environment Gradients,Boundaries and Buffers. CRC Press Inc.,1996.112~131.
  • 6Rapport D J, Costanza R, McMichael A J. Assessing ecosystem health. Trend in Ecology & Evolution, 1998, 13: 397~402.
  • 7Rapport D J. et al. Evaluating landscape health: integrating societal goals and biophysical process. Journal of Environmental Management, 1998,53:1~15.
  • 8Rapport D J. Evolution of indicators Ecosystem Health. In:Daniel,H. eds. Ecological Indicators. Barking:Elsevier Science Publishers Ltd,1992. 121~134.
  • 9Costanza R, Norton B G, Haskel B D. Ecosystem Health: new goals for environmental management. California:Island Press,1992.
  • 10FAO Proceedings. Land Quality Indicators and Their Use in Sustainable Agriculture and Rural Development, Proceedings of the Workshop organized by the Land and Water Development Division FAO Agriculture Department, 1997.2:5.

共引文献425

同被引文献1332

引证文献71

二级引证文献1184

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部