摘要
俄罗斯在近200年的近(现)代化转型过程中,在立法和学说上一直有将知识产权内容纳入民法典的历史传统,但并非是将知识产权法全部民法典化。目前的《俄罗斯联邦民法典》第四部分的现状,既有俄罗斯知识产权法与民法典关系的传统见解的历史惯性作用,即在将知识产权法规范是否纳入民法典的问题上,也有当代俄罗斯立法者在立法抉择上的偶然性作用,即在是否将全部知识产权法规范都纳入民法典,并废除主要的知识产权单行法的问题上。
The convention which intellectual property has always been compiled into the civil code has existed during about 200 years till now of Russia transition. But it is by no means the intellectual property law has been completely civil coderization. At present, the status of Part IV of The Civil Code of the Russia Federation, results from both the role of historical inertia of the traditional views of the relationship between the Russian Civil Code and the intellectual property law, that is whether the norms of intellectual property law will be incorporated into the civil code, and the contingent of the decision of the contemporary Russian legislator in the legislative decision on the role of chance, that is, whether or not at all the norms of intellectual property law into the civil code, and the abolition of the major questions of intellectual property rights on a single law.
出处
《河北法学》
CSSCI
北大核心
2009年第12期37-41,共5页
Hebei Law Science
基金
重庆市哲学社会科学规划青年项目<俄罗斯知识产权立法法典化研究>(2008-NFX03)
关键词
俄罗斯知识产权立法
知识产权立法民法典化
知识产权立法与民法典的相互关系
legislation on intellecual property of Russia
civil code-rization of intellectual property
relationship between intellectual property legislation and civil code