期刊文献+

激励脉冲宽度对加速度计冲击校准误差的影响 被引量:6

Effect of the Exciting Pulse Duration on the Error of the Shock Calibration for Accelerometers
下载PDF
导出
摘要 加速度计准静态校准要求激励信号的频率与加速度计谐振频率相比足够低,以减小校准误差。通过加速度计数学模型建立了激励加速度脉冲宽度、加速度计谐振频率和校准误差之间的关系式;针对Hopkinson杆冲击校准装置,理论计算和实验结果表明,激励加速度脉冲宽度决定于应力脉冲前沿宽度,受应力波弥散影响,而与加速度计安装座长度无关。为选用和产生满足要求的激励脉冲信号提供了依据。 The frequency of the exciting signal should be lower enough than the resonant frequency of the accelerometer to reduce the error of the quasi - static calibration. The relation between the duration of the exciting acceleration pulse, the resonant frequency of the accelerometer and the calibration error was established through the mathematical model. In allusion to the calibration with Hopkinson bar, the theoretical calculation and the experiments show that the duration of the exciting acceleration pulse was determined by the rising-edge duration of the stress pulse, and influenced by the diffusion of thes tress wave, but is independent of the aceelerometer installing seat. The basis is provided for selection and generation the right exciting pulse.
出处 《仪表技术与传感器》 CSCD 北大核心 2009年第B11期44-46,56,共4页 Instrument Technique and Sensor
关键词 加速度计 冲击校准 误差 HOPKINSON杆 accelerometer shock calibration error Hopkinson bar
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

  • 1YUSAKU F. Impact response measurement of an accelerometer. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing, 2007, 21 : 2072 -2079.
  • 2LINK A, TA.UBNER A, WABINSKI W, et al. Modelling accelerometers for transient signals using calibration measurements upon sinusoidal excitation. Measurement, 2007, 40 : 928 - 935.
  • 3UMEDA A, ONOE M, SAKATA K. Calibration of three-axis accelerometers using a three-dimensional vibration generator and three laser interferometers. Sensor and Actuators (A), 2004, 114: 93- 101.
  • 4UEDA K, UMEDA A. Improvement of novel NRLM method for aecelerometer characterization to the range 10^2 ms^-2. Sensor and Actuators (A), 2003, 54:517-522.
  • 5梁志国,李新良,孙璟宇,连大鸿.激光干涉法一次冲击加速度计动态特性校准[J].测试技术学报,2004,18(2):133-138. 被引量:24

二级参考文献13

  • 1Li Bin.Study on the Measurement of in(plane Displacement of Solid Surfaces by Laser Doppler Velocimetory[J].Opt.Laser Techn,1995,27(2):89-93.
  • 2ISO/5347-21:Shock Calibration Using Laser Doppler Velocimeter,1996.
  • 3Umeda A.Characterization of AE-transducers Using Davies Bar and Laser Interferometry[C].Progress in Accustic Emission,Proc 11th int AE Symp,1992.
  • 4Bateman V I.Characteristics of Piezoresitiv Accelerometer in Shock Environments up to 150000g[C].Proc 41st Ann Mtg Inst Environ Sci,Ananeim,CA,1995.217-224.
  • 5Umeda K.Characterization of Chock Accelerometers Using Davies Bar and Laser Interferometer[J].Expt1 Mech,1995,35(3):216-223.
  • 6Batemen V I.The Use of Beryllium Hopkinson Bar to Characterize a Piezoresistive Accelerometer Shock Envir-onments[C].Proc 42nd Ann Mtg,Inst Environ Sci,Orlando,FL,1996.336-343.
  • 7Wang S.High G.Accelerometer Dynamic Calibration by a Laser Differential Doppler Technique[J].Rev.Sci.Ins-trum,1996,67(2):2022-2025.
  • 8ISO/WD5347-23.Primary Shock Calibration Using Laser Interferometry,1996.
  • 9New Shock Acceleration Standard,PTB News,1996.
  • 10梅田章.加速度的标准(日)[J].计量管理,1991,40(2):13-19.

共引文献23

同被引文献52

引证文献6

二级引证文献16

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部