期刊文献+

Dust Storm Ensemble Forecast Experiments in East Asia 被引量:2

Dust Storm Ensemble Forecast Experiments in East Asia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), as a unified approach to both data assimilation and ensemble forecasting problems, is used to investigate the performance of dust storm ensemble forecasting targeting a dust episode in the East Asia during 23-30 May 2007. The errors in the input wind field, dust emission intensity, and dry deposition velocity are among important model uncertainties and are considered in the model error perturbations. These model errors are not assumed to have zero-means. The model error means representing the model bias are estimated as part of the data assimilation process. Observations from a LIDAR network are assimilated to generate the initial ensembles and correct the model biases. The ensemble forecast skills are evaluated against the observations and a benchmark/control forecast, which is a simple model run without assimilation of any observations. Another ensemble forecast experiment is also performed without the model bias correction in order to examine the impact of the bias correction. Results show that the ensemble-mean, as deterministic forecasts have substantial improvement over the control forecasts and correctly captures the major dust arrival and cessation timing at each observation site. However, the forecast skill decreases as the forecast lead time increases. Bias correction further improved the forecasts in down wind areas. The forecasts within 24 hours are most improved and better than those without the bias correction. The examination of the ensemble forecast skills using the Brier scores and the relative operating characteristic curves and areas indicates that the ensemble forecasting system has useful forecast skills. The ensemble Kalman filter (EnKF), as a unified approach to both data assimilation and ensemble forecasting problems, is used to investigate the performance of dust storm ensemble forecasting targeting a dust episode in the East Asia during 23-30 May 2007. The errors in the input wind field, dust emission intensity, and dry deposition velocity are among important model uncertainties and are considered in the model error perturbations. These model errors are not assumed to have zero-means. The model error means representing the model bias are estimated as part of the data assimilation process. Observations from a LIDAR network are assimilated to generate the initial ensembles and correct the model biases. The ensemble forecast skills are evaluated against the observations and a benchmark/control forecast, which is a simple model run without assimilation of any observations. Another ensemble forecast experiment is also performed without the model bias correction in order to examine the impact of the bias correction. Results show that the ensemble-mean, as deterministic forecasts have substantial improvement over the control forecasts and correctly captures the major dust arrival and cessation timing at each observation site. However, the forecast skill decreases as the forecast lead time increases. Bias correction further improved the forecasts in down wind areas. The forecasts within 24 hours are most improved and better than those without the bias correction. The examination of the ensemble forecast skills using the Brier scores and the relative operating characteristic curves and areas indicates that the ensemble forecasting system has useful forecast skills.
出处 《Advances in Atmospheric Sciences》 SCIE CAS CSCD 2009年第6期1053-1070,共18页 大气科学进展(英文版)
基金 supported by the Chinese Academy of Sciences (Grant Nos.KZCX2-YW-202, KZCX2-YW-205) the National Basic Research Program of China (2006CB403600) the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.40221503)
关键词 dust storm ensemble forecast data assimilation bias correction dust storm, ensemble forecast, data assimilation, bias correction
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献62

  • 1安俊岭,王自发,黄美元,陶树旺,程新金,叶红.区域空气质量数值预报模型[J].气候与环境研究,1999,4(3):244-251. 被引量:7
  • 2张小曳,张光宇,安芷生,陈拓,黄湘萍,朱光华,张德二.中国源区粉尘的元素示踪[J].中国科学(D辑),1996,26(5):423-430. 被引量:43
  • 3Duce R A. 2995. Sources, distributions, and fluxes of mineral aerosols and their relationship to climate [C]. Aerosol Forcing of Climate. John Wiley, New York, 43 - 72.
  • 4Gong S L, Zhang X Y, Zhao T L, et al. 2003. Characterization of soil dust aerosol in China and its transport and distribution during 2001 ACE-Asia: 2. Model simulation and validation [J]. J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D9), 4262, doi: 10. 1029/2002JD002633.
  • 5Han Z W, Ueda H, Matsuda K, et al. 2004. Model study on particle size segregation and deposition during Asian dust events in March 2002[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 109, D19205, doi: 10. 1029/ 2004JD004920.
  • 6Huebert B J, Bates T, Russell P B, et al. 2003. An overview of ACE-Asia: Strategies for quantifying the relationships between Asian aerosols and their climatic impacts [J]. J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D23) : 8633, doi: 10. 1029/2003JD003550.
  • 7Murayama T, Sugimoto N, Uno I, et al. 2001. Ground-based network observation ol Asian dust events of April 1998 in East Asia[J].J. Geophys. Res., 106:18345-18359.
  • 8Park S U, In H J. 2003. Parameterization of dust emission for the simulation of the yellow sand (Asian dust) event observed in March 2002 in Korea[J]. J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D19): 4618, doi: 10. 1029/2003JD003484.
  • 9Shao Y P. 2001. A model of mineral dust emission [J]. J. Geophys. Res., 106:20239- 20254.
  • 10Shao Y P, Yang Y, Wang J J, et al. 2003. Northeast Asian dust storms: Real-time numerical prediction and validation[J].J. Geophys. Res., 108 (D22): 4691, doi: 10. 1029/2003JD003667.

共引文献11

同被引文献11

引证文献2

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部